This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
I totally agree, but I do have to wonder why the 22 year old had what has been described as an "AR-style" weapon?
ExperienceDLT · M
@samueltyler2 20 year old and was reportedly an AR-15
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@ExperienceDLT those weapons banned, but with a built in date of expiration. These weapons have no place in private civilian hands.
goodlil666 · 51-55, M
@samueltyler2 They absolutely do , more so than any other weapon available to law abiding citizens today.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@ExperienceDLT yes, my error, and now the police/FBI are saying someone in the family bought the rifle, not the shooter.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@goodlil666 tell me why do we need needs an AR-Style weapon!
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@goodlil666 so you have a direct line to put founding Father's? There were no such weapons at the time, not even a dream. If you need a semiautomatic weapon to hunt, i suggest you would be better off taking lessons and become a better marksman.
goodlil666 · 51-55, M
@samueltyler2 Just because someone is not old enough to purchase a weapon does not mean they are not legally permitted to posses that weapon.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@goodlil666 please explain what that means?
goodlil666 · 51-55, M
@samueltyler2 it's pretty self explanatory. I just got done schooling you on the meaning of the 2nd Amendment.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@goodlil666 oh, have you? What makes you a very institutional scholar? So you believe a "citizen" at any age, should be allowed to own a weapon?
goodlil666 · 51-55, M
@samueltyler2 Your a joke.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@goodlil666 again, insults don't bother me! Tell me what you think about your own statement!