This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ElRengo · 70-79, M
Call it the bias of the need of personal witness, the nonsense of "common sense", the ballast of "philosophic" dualism, the blindness of a "logos" based rationalism and a quite poor understanding of probabilities (and of the nature of math and of logic as a branch of it).
All of them are also present in an almost still Ptolemaic view of the world, terraplanism and vitalism.
No objection to each one´s believes, as long they don´t pretend them to have any validation in Science, of course.
By the way the above haves no needed relation to atheism vs faith debates
All of them are also present in an almost still Ptolemaic view of the world, terraplanism and vitalism.
No objection to each one´s believes, as long they don´t pretend them to have any validation in Science, of course.
By the way the above haves no needed relation to atheism vs faith debates