Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Pentagon officials stunned by Hegseth decision on troops in Poland.

Pete Hegseth’s last-minute decision to cancel the deployment of 4,000 troops to Poland caught Pentagon staff and European allies by surprise — the latest example of an abrupt personnel move from the Defense secretary that blindsided both sides of the Atlantic.

It wasn’t clear exactly why Hegseth issued the order, according to three defense officials familiar with the matter. President Donald Trump has repeatedly expressed anger and frustration with European allies for their failure to help with the Iran war, although Trump has labeled Poland a "model ally” for its high defense spending.

The decision was even more surprising because troops and equipment had already started to arrive in the country. It sent fresh waves of anxiety through European capitals and inside the Pentagon on Thursday about whether such moves could embolden Russia — and which ally might turn into the next target.

“We had no idea this was coming,” said one of the U.S. officials, adding that European and American officials have spent the last 24 hours on the phone trying to understand the decision and figure out if more surprises are coming.

The move follows Hegseth’s announcement this month that the Pentagon would withdraw 5,000 troops from bases in Germany. But that decision followed through on a threat Trump made after German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said the U.S. was "humiliating" itself with the conflict in Iran.

The 4,000 Texas-based troops were preparing to leave on a long-planned nine month rotation to Poland that includes training with NATO allies when the order to halt came through. The cancellation of this routine mission is especially unusual given that American troops stationed on the continent are a key deterrent to Russia. Trump has insisted that Europe will have to fend for itself — even as he’s railed against allies’ opposition to the Iran conflict — and this latest order suggests the president is serious about reducing the American footprint on the continent.

The Army’s role in Europe “is all about deterring the Russians, protecting America's strategic interests and assuring allies,” said the Lt. Gen. Ben Hodges, the former commander of the U.S. Army in Europe. “And now a very important asset that was coming to be part of that deterrence is gone.”

The White House referred questions to the Pentagon, which defended the move as a carefully considered process. "The decision to withdraw troops follows a comprehensive, multilayered process that incorporates perspectives from key leaders in [U.S. military in Europe] and across the chain of command," said acting Pentagon press secretary Joel Valdez. "This was not an unexpected, last minute decision."

But the broader strategy remains unclear. The German withdrawal is still in the planning stages, according to two of the U.S. officials familiar with the matter, who like some others, were granted anonymity to discuss internal conversations. It amounts to a relatively minor drawdown of the 38,000 U.S. troops in the country, but sends a signal to European allies that they could pay a price for publicly disagreeing with the White House.

“The Poles certainly have never criticized President Trump, and they do all the things that good allies are supposed to do,” said Hodges. “And yet, this happens.”

The Pentagon defended the move as a carefully considered process. "The decision to withdraw troops follows a comprehensive, multilayered process that incorporates perspectives from key leaders in [U.S. military in Europe] and across the chain of command," said acting Pentagon press secretary Joel Valdez. "This was not an unexpected, last minute decision."

The White House did not respond to requests for comment.
Top | New | Old
CactusJackManson · 51-55, M
Here's an idea. For the first time in 80 years, let Europe defend itself.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@CactusJackManson Europe has taken a strong step in that direction by removing the US from its planning.
CactusJackManson · 51-55, M
@newjaninev2 Wonderful!
They are going to need them at home to defend the Supreme court judges against the people..😷
Khenpal1 · M
lol, paying twice for shipment.
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
The US is slowly leaving NATO.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Khenpal1 It's OK - america's king wants to build a new battleship! 😂😂

86 47
wrule · F
@Khenpal1 Asymmetric warfare is the new weapon.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@wrule a few weeks ago the Scandinavian armed forces took part in a warfare exercise and invited the Ukrainians to participate as an 'opposing' force using the tactics and drone warfare they have developed in fighting the russian infestation on their land.

The Scandinavians didn't stand a chance - the Ukrainians tore them apart.

The russia-america alliance is still building equipment from last century and using tactics from manuals written in the same era.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
Seriously? We're invading Poland now?

Can we please just call him Hitler?
@LordShadowfire I predict a time when the name Trump will be spoken in the same way the name Hitler is now spoken..The question remains whether America will be regarded in the same way as Germany..😷
Administrations used to make policy by consulting national security advisors and the Dept of State and Dept of Defense.

This admin makes policy via solo late night tweetstorms from a guy who keeps falling asleep during the day. Of COURSE silly mistakes will be made!!


 
Post Comment