Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
RedFlower · F
there is so much wrong in there i wouldnt know where to start correcting all of this. i suggest a chemistry 101 book and start from their from scratch... there are a ton of misconceptions you have
Dainbramadge · 56-60, M
@RedFlower Thank you for your help.

Every high school science class. Trees absorb co2 and release o2…

2022…
We’re all gunna die!
Thevy29 · 41-45, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout If all the bad gases stayed at ground level as you suggest we'd all be dead by now..

And there are far fewer trees in the world then there was in high school days.
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout its more likely the ditch on either side of the road for water run, not only holds water , but gets excess water from what's displaced by the road.

But you arent completely wrong about what's called 'carbon fertilisation'.
And car exhausts do also release water vapour.
Mardrae · F
There’s a book I’m reading that explains stuff like this. I ordered it on Kindle. It’s called “The answer “ by David Icke
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Dainbramadge · 56-60, M
@MalteseFalconPunch yeah I have to go through later on tonight and actually reread all of the comments. I got my boys today and so my attention is a little split at the moment.
I'm glad most of the people actually saw that I was looking for answers and not trying to start a fight.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
helenS · 36-40, F
@MalteseFalconPunch Yes, it's converted to O2 in a catalytic cycle. The main catalyst is ClOOCl.
It's a result of (a) anthropogenic release of CFCs and (b) the very special physical conditions within the polar vortex during winter.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Subsumedpat · 36-40, M
All you need to know about is how much CO2 we have in the atmosphere in parts per million and what that is going to mean for us.

When was the last time CO2 was 400 ppm? The last time global carbon dioxide levels were consistently at or above 400 parts per million (ppm) was around four million years ago during a geological period known as the Pliocene Era (between 5.3 million and 2.6 million years ago). The world was about 3℃ warmer and sea levels were higher than today.

We are on track to hit 500 PPM in 50 years, will get ugly then.
helenS · 36-40, F
The wiki article about stratospheric ozone depletion might be helpful:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_depletion
You might need some basic knowledge of chemistry though.
Driver2 · M
Climate change is a tool to destroy capitalism and freedom
Don’t let it mess you up
It’s as ludicrous as their supposed solutions

Thevy29 · 41-45, M
Good gas create layer of protection against sun. Bad gas replaces good gas. And were the protective layer is at its most vulnerable a hole forms.

But don't take my word on it. I slept through almost all my science classes back in school.
Dainbramadge · 56-60, M
@Thevy29 But how do the bad gasses get to the good gasses if they are heavier??
Thevy29 · 41-45, M
@Dainbramadge I must have slept through that part.
The ozone is made up of a lot of gasses? They can change, they might reflect what else is happening in their environment, are they are solids to you? Unmovable and unchangeable?
helenS · 36-40, F
I've got on more comment: polar ozone depletion is a stratospheric process, and is unrelated to the climate change you mentioned in the title of your post.
Dainbramadge · 56-60, M
@helenS Thank you. I will look more closely into it.
bookerdana · M
I don't have any memes🤷‍♀️ but this first link😱 (so much fun ,right?) explains the ozoone layer,the second Climate change.."I'm a doctor not a Scientist ,Jim!!!"🤦‍♂️

https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/research/ozone-uv/moreinfo?view=deleption-climate-change

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change
SW-User
So something you do understand is that ozone is a diamagnetic molecule.

But you don't understand how you would "put a hole in a gas and how a hole could be over earth's pole where there has been no industry."

Well at least your username is no misnomer.

Dainbramadge · 56-60, M
@SW-User But your first comment seemed worth it?
SW-User
@Dainbramadge Yeah. Did you want a chemistry lesson?

[media=https://youtu.be/5CGtESB40Rc]

Enjoy.
Dainbramadge · 56-60, M
@SW-User Well thank you for that. Also thank you for not posting a 30 min or longer video.
Not to sound ungrateful but it really didn't answer any of my questions.
pianoplayingsteve · 31-35, M
Greta thurnberg reminds me of the Catholic child saint. The Catholic girl claimed to see the Virgin Mary in the sky and ended up getting a large following with ‘trust me, something is going to happen in the sky and it’ll be cataclysmic, you’ll have to follow the rules of my religion to save the day’. With approval from adult clergymen. Sounds similar to Thurnberg’s claims in many ways. Before Greta the activists used some other little girl claiming that we only had a few more years, over a decade ago. They keep changing the terms too to keep it relevant. It was global cooling, then global warming, then climate change. She started with ‘climate crisis’ and now it’s ‘climate catastrophe’. Wonder what the the term will be next but it’s clearly going to be a secular version of some sort of demonic invasion, as they are ruining out of scary names.oh wait they already have their demons, the ‘far right’ are the secular demons.

 
Post Comment