This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DunningKruger · 61-69, M
Our future energy needs will likely be met by a combination of those and other technologies. The biggest limiting factor at the moment, however, is storage of energy, which is especially an issue when dealing with renewables.
Although the joke has been that fusion is just 20 or 30 years away for the past 50 or 60 years, there have been some recent developments in that field that make me hopeful we might actually see commercial fusion reactors in our lifetime, so there's that.
Then again, we're entering into a period of maximum solar activity, so it's possible that a stray solar flare will toss us all back to the stone age. I guess we'll see.
Although the joke has been that fusion is just 20 or 30 years away for the past 50 or 60 years, there have been some recent developments in that field that make me hopeful we might actually see commercial fusion reactors in our lifetime, so there's that.
Then again, we're entering into a period of maximum solar activity, so it's possible that a stray solar flare will toss us all back to the stone age. I guess we'll see.
SomeMichGuy · M
@DunningKruger We have a huge fusion reactor out there in space; we don't have to build it, contain it, decommission it, etc.
S33K3R · 36-40, F
@DunningKruger i love your name lol the us govt is about to start mining like crazy for all of the REEs that go into this new age tech. We're about to see a new scale of toxic around the country. They just finished deep scanning the entire USA. Here comes the mines renewables require. Poison the rivers and land to save us from "global warming" haha! They'll see the cold is going to be setting in... just as soon as solar max starts to decline next year.