Brigitte Bardot Slams #MeToo Movement As ‘Hypocritical, Ridiculous’
She was not known for her smarts
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Tatsumi · 31-35, M
Good thing she's turning that around.
Tatsumi · 31-35, M
@LILY61 There's a difference between "you approve rape," and, "you disapprove of rape culture paranoia."
I lost interest when I heard the women who actively said, "Yes," then later whined ahout "feeling like they had no choice, because Louie C.K. was a powerful man." If you said yes, that's the end of the story, unless active coersion was used. Which it was not. Use your fucking words. Because that's how people communicate.
Or the guy who got kevin. Spacey fired based on saying, "Oh yeah, this happened 40 years ago."
And no. One should not be publically humiliated over a [b]unproven criminal act [/b]. That's the police's territory. An accusation should not be proof of guilt, in any capacity.
We have a responsibility to the accused, as well.
Or would you like to lose your job or be publically humiliated, if I say you raped me 20 years ago?
Think about it for a second, and relate it to yourself.
This is a result of women's innate same-group bias. An instinct men do not have. Any time a woman is percieved as a victim, everyone loses their shit and starts pointing fingers in every direction.
The public is a fucking mob. They have no right dishing out justice. That is the courts job. They'd string up any random guy based on nothing. This is why we have courts.
And, paranoia will not help victims. It will hurt them, because it will hide the real victims amidst the outright lies [which women do, believe it or not--since they're human], and the misleading truths, and the just completely misremembered facts, since human memory is so awful after decades.
I lost interest when I heard the women who actively said, "Yes," then later whined ahout "feeling like they had no choice, because Louie C.K. was a powerful man." If you said yes, that's the end of the story, unless active coersion was used. Which it was not. Use your fucking words. Because that's how people communicate.
Or the guy who got kevin. Spacey fired based on saying, "Oh yeah, this happened 40 years ago."
And no. One should not be publically humiliated over a [b]unproven criminal act [/b]. That's the police's territory. An accusation should not be proof of guilt, in any capacity.
We have a responsibility to the accused, as well.
Or would you like to lose your job or be publically humiliated, if I say you raped me 20 years ago?
Think about it for a second, and relate it to yourself.
This is a result of women's innate same-group bias. An instinct men do not have. Any time a woman is percieved as a victim, everyone loses their shit and starts pointing fingers in every direction.
The public is a fucking mob. They have no right dishing out justice. That is the courts job. They'd string up any random guy based on nothing. This is why we have courts.
And, paranoia will not help victims. It will hurt them, because it will hide the real victims amidst the outright lies [which women do, believe it or not--since they're human], and the misleading truths, and the just completely misremembered facts, since human memory is so awful after decades.
@Tatsumi why do people always use the failing memory ploy? i remember being raped very well. and no one listened to me. they destroyed my reputation and made it seem like it was in my head. i have no life because of what they did to me. and women...don't get me started. until this movement started, women sheepishly went along and pretended that whatever the men say is true. now, they are finally banding together...something women never do...and getting even and getting heard. and as for Spacey...several others came forward after the kid from Adventures in Babysitting brought it to light. men are the ones with the same group bias. women just hate everyone.
Tatsumi · 31-35, M
@LILY61 Do you know the most unreliable form of evidence is in the court of law? Human memory
They taught us that in psychology 101. Human memory is ridiculously bad. Over time, memories shift, memories combine together, and entirely new memories are created. It's true that traumatic experiences are typically remembered much better--but, at the same time, human memory itself is not sufficient evidence to destroy someone else's life.
Saying "well, your memory sucks." [u]Isn't a legitimate defense [/u]against an accusation--but, memory itself [u]is also not sufficient evidence. [/u]Particularly from 40 years ago.
Women always band together and identify as "women". Due to that same-group preference. Men do not share this instinct.
At minimum, women have "banded together" for the past 100 years. Even if you don't believe it's instinct.
We had to kill each other a lot, in human history. We could not have protected our people or competed against other men foe the affection of women [which is a limited resource, for men]. Men are naturally the enemy, for men. And men have no issies throwing other random men under the bus to either identify with women or just for power or whatever else.
Whereas, women had to get along together while the men were out hunting and getting killed. So, women evolved a much stronger sense of "togetherness" than men did. Unfortunately, that also leads to negative things, as well.
Men do not care about men, just because they are also men. There has to be some other commonality.
Women will go. "Ahh, I am also a woman, so we're on the same team." But no man goes, "Ahh, I am also a man, so we're on the same team."
This is scientific fact. It's not a theory. It's not a suggestion. It is human nature.
See. But I can't help hearing, "Women are finally banding together, so justice no longer matters."
I *do* realize it was different in the olden days. But our society has shifted from the [u]myth of the woman who always lies to the woman who never lies.[/u]
The pendulum has swung too far. We require a balance. We require protecting both victims *and* the accused. Or do you think otherwise? Or do you think mob justice is preferable?
They taught us that in psychology 101. Human memory is ridiculously bad. Over time, memories shift, memories combine together, and entirely new memories are created. It's true that traumatic experiences are typically remembered much better--but, at the same time, human memory itself is not sufficient evidence to destroy someone else's life.
Saying "well, your memory sucks." [u]Isn't a legitimate defense [/u]against an accusation--but, memory itself [u]is also not sufficient evidence. [/u]Particularly from 40 years ago.
Women always band together and identify as "women". Due to that same-group preference. Men do not share this instinct.
At minimum, women have "banded together" for the past 100 years. Even if you don't believe it's instinct.
We had to kill each other a lot, in human history. We could not have protected our people or competed against other men foe the affection of women [which is a limited resource, for men]. Men are naturally the enemy, for men. And men have no issies throwing other random men under the bus to either identify with women or just for power or whatever else.
Whereas, women had to get along together while the men were out hunting and getting killed. So, women evolved a much stronger sense of "togetherness" than men did. Unfortunately, that also leads to negative things, as well.
Men do not care about men, just because they are also men. There has to be some other commonality.
Women will go. "Ahh, I am also a woman, so we're on the same team." But no man goes, "Ahh, I am also a man, so we're on the same team."
This is scientific fact. It's not a theory. It's not a suggestion. It is human nature.
See. But I can't help hearing, "Women are finally banding together, so justice no longer matters."
I *do* realize it was different in the olden days. But our society has shifted from the [u]myth of the woman who always lies to the woman who never lies.[/u]
The pendulum has swung too far. We require a balance. We require protecting both victims *and* the accused. Or do you think otherwise? Or do you think mob justice is preferable?
@Tatsumi wow, you know nothing about women. there is a famous joke that i won't tell. but it is about women and dating. they meet a guy and he has the same friends he had back in preschool but the woman just met her best friend in the ladies room. women say they are friends but they never really are. they bad mouth each other constantly. they stab each other in the back for no reason. and they almost never take another woman's side against men. BUT because so many women have been raped and molested and are now speaking openly about it...now you have a mob mentality. if harvey is seen in public by a group of angry women...he would be beaten to a pulp.
Tatsumi · 31-35, M
@LILY61 I'm afraid I know women more than you do. Like I said. This is not a theory. This is not conjecture. It's fact.
Multiple studies have been done showing it.
Yes. There is that aspect of women, as well. But I never said, "Women always love other women."
http://www.apa.org/monitor/
[Connect these two]
dec04/women.aspx
"Women are nearly five times more likely to show an automatic preference for their own gender than men are to show such favoritism to their own gender."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
m/pubmed/15491274/
Multiple studies have been done showing it.
Yes. There is that aspect of women, as well. But I never said, "Women always love other women."
http://www.apa.org/monitor/
[Connect these two]
dec04/women.aspx
"Women are nearly five times more likely to show an automatic preference for their own gender than men are to show such favoritism to their own gender."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
m/pubmed/15491274/
@Tatsumi that is so laughable i think this is sad. you know nothing about women and claiming that you know them better than an actual woman? that is funny! Girls in school are more likely to be with girls...once they get away from all that... Women side with men 9 out of ten times. the other time is when they are with a group of female friends and don't want to appear to be a bitch.
@Tatsumi i could only find two m. dittmanns and that is a microbiologist and another is an editor. looked at the biography of the editor for the psychology crap and she also writes for Realtor.com also. let's read her fascinating rendition of a realtor gone koo koo...isn't that Death of a house salesman?
Tatsumi · 31-35, M
@LILY61 Yes, I'm sure your personal experience is applicable to all women--and, I'm sure you have 0 biases.
Do you see the same thing on SW? Women taking up for men, over women?
Have another. The "Women Are Wonderful" effect.
https://www.scholars.northwestern.edu/en
/publications/are-people-prejudiced-against-women-some-answers-from-research-on-2
Fine. If that source from the American Psychology Association wasn't up to your standards, then look at the other two.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
m/pubmed/15491274/
Do you see the same thing on SW? Women taking up for men, over women?
Have another. The "Women Are Wonderful" effect.
https://www.scholars.northwestern.edu/en
/publications/are-people-prejudiced-against-women-some-answers-from-research-on-2
Fine. If that source from the American Psychology Association wasn't up to your standards, then look at the other two.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
m/pubmed/15491274/
@Tatsumi why should i read more tripe about tripe? i don't care what some youngster with a small tiny window of experience has to say about women and their mental issues. i have traveled and experienced alot of relationships and situations and the only time women take up for each other is when they have a camera on them or they think it is time for them to do so because some other group of women told them they should. If women weren't so competitive with and jealous of each other, we would rule the world.
Tatsumi · 31-35, M
@LILY61 Believe gravity doesn't exist, for all I care. Women will have an automatic same-group preference, either way--regardless of your faulty human brain's percieved experience. That's not an insult, just saying the reason we have science is because the human brain is stupid and emotional.
And women control a lot more than you might think. Female power is subtle. Male power is overt. Just because you can't see one as much doesn't mean it's not there. Female power is the power of complaint and manipulation, the power to scream or cry and have men come running, the power to define what is and is not a man. Which is powerful, indeed.
Women have always had as much if not more power to control the world, as men. With perhaps a few exceptions in some areas.
More, considering that women reproduce twice as often as men, currently... This number has been as high as 15x, throughout history. Meaning--women have had a MUCH greater capacity to influence generations upon generations of men. Whom, as you recall, begin as easily influenced boys.
Well, I'm also saying that my brain is in its prime. So, whatever I lack in experience, I make up for in thought and research and logical capacity. Much like a male gynecologist knows more about your vagina than you do, despite not having one.
And women control a lot more than you might think. Female power is subtle. Male power is overt. Just because you can't see one as much doesn't mean it's not there. Female power is the power of complaint and manipulation, the power to scream or cry and have men come running, the power to define what is and is not a man. Which is powerful, indeed.
Women have always had as much if not more power to control the world, as men. With perhaps a few exceptions in some areas.
More, considering that women reproduce twice as often as men, currently... This number has been as high as 15x, throughout history. Meaning--women have had a MUCH greater capacity to influence generations upon generations of men. Whom, as you recall, begin as easily influenced boys.
Well, I'm also saying that my brain is in its prime. So, whatever I lack in experience, I make up for in thought and research and logical capacity. Much like a male gynecologist knows more about your vagina than you do, despite not having one.
@Tatsumi you are one of those college grajee-ats that thinks what you learned in school is true. all religion is the same and mainly advocates hate...that is a fact. women will believe and side with any man as long as they feel any attraction toward him. women (not myself) have a natural aggression toward all other women unless they feel completely superior in all ways to that woman.( I have no idea why i feel no tendencies like this). women are more likely to be serial killers. they are just better at it. they plan. men just go crazy and kill something violently. we are alot closer than people think (men and women) but because we can't help but have our dna from ancestors, we tend to retain their memories and behave accordingly. and you are they silliest man/boy i have ever debated with on this site.