@NerdyPotato True, and perhaps the rules of engagement were too broad. However, I have not seen it articulated what an acceptable figure would be. The argument against Israel is that it is committing genocide full stop and must stop further attacks against Hamas. That’s what a ceasefire would require.

@Bumbles me neither, and there will never be a figure that everyone finds acceptable other than zero. But I think we [i]can[/i] all agree that 90% is absolutely unacceptable by far. If Israel comes up with a plan to target Hamas and only Hamas, they have my full support to execute that. But if their best tactic is to kill everything that moves like it is now, a full stop on both sides is the only sensible thing to give them time to think of something better.

@NerdyPotato I understand your position, and as I find it a reasoned one, even if I may disagree with the conclusion, no need to press farther. Thx.

@RedBaron The war would end tomorrow if hostages are released and Hamas and Hizbollah surrenders!

@Guardian HEZBOLLAH.

And this conflict is not new and is unlikely to be resolved peacefully anytime soon.

@RedBaron thats a matter of who you ask

@Guardian Hezbollah is the proper spelling. Hizbollah is just a pronunciation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hezbollah

@RedBaron ok