Top | Newest First | Oldest First
SW-User
No. If nothing else, I would find it supremely awkward to own a human being.
eMortal · M
@SW-User and that idea wouldn't even sync in my mind
JonathanC · 61-69, M
No. Legal does not necessarily mean moral.
bijouxbroussard · F
@JonathanC [b]Thank you.[/b]
Maybe.. if the maintenance fee is more cheap than paying a housemaid
MrAboo · 36-40, M
I’m in the south. Of course I would.
This message was deleted by its author.
Zaphod42 · 46-50, M
I feel like the correct answer is...no? 🤔😅
PrincessVelvet · F
I wouldn't, no. I bet that would be really popular in the southern states though.
bijouxbroussard · F
@Milkshake Good example. And no choices.
Milkshake · F
@bijouxbroussard i still would like a slave though =P
bijouxbroussard · F
@Milkshake Why ? Rather than a servant ?
Northwest · M
If murder was legal, would you kill?
How about stealing?
How about stealing?
TheProphet · M
@Northwest Chance to take.
Northwest · M
@TheProphet I'm sure you would 🤣
TheProphet · M
@Northwest I certainly would.
Extra2000 · 22-25, M
Helllllllll no
TheProphet · M
Yes
SW-User
Goralski · 51-55, M
Hmmmmm and Would this slave know how to cook
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 41-45, MVIP
They prefer ‘unpaid work force’...
nedkelly · 61-69, M
I am married
flowerboy · 22-25, T
Only if it was a house elf
NickiHijab · F
Definitely not
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
DaughterOfTheDust · 22-25, F
No. Legal or illegal, I would refuse to be a part of any institution that diminishes the dignity and free will of a human person.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
msros · F
People have hired help in their houses.
bijouxbroussard · F
@msros But they get to choose and are hired (paid).
msros · F
@bijouxbroussard Yes.
Ryanoliver2011 · 26-30, M
Sure I could use some help lol
That0ne · 26-30, M
Depends what kind... 😉🤭
vetguy1991 · 51-55, M
No I wouldn't
GoodoldBob · 61-69, M
Yes
Ramon67 · 61-69, M
No
No.
Princessvampilia · 31-35, F
No.
bijouxbroussard · F
Never. And I’d be an active abolitionist.
ImperialAerosolKidFromEP · 46-50, M
With a birth year starting with "19"? Not a chance. If it began with "16", anyone who says "no" is probably being disingenuous
bijouxbroussard · F
@ImperialAerosolKidFromEP There were abolitionists then, although mostly it was for religious reasons.
ImperialAerosolKidFromEP · 46-50, M
@bijouxbroussard even centuries before. That's why I said "probably"
uncalled4 · 56-60, M
I do not think I could, no.
MartinTheFirst · 26-30, M
of course!