I Hate Guys Who Hit Women
This month is Domestic Violence Awareness month. Just putting that out there.
31-35, F
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Ketsan
45% of victims are men. The most violent relationships are lesbian relationships, the least violent are gay relationships.
anonimatovato
i heard that in gay domestic violence relationships, both parties put a beat down. it sounds deadly to me having 2 men beating the living crap of each other.... people, that shit ain't right! walk out of it if you can!
Madison18
Where did you get these statistics? They're wildly inaccurate from the statistics I've read about.
Ketsan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1303598/posts
That's because you've only heard the stats and narrative made up by feminists.
That's because you've only heard the stats and narrative made up by feminists.
Madison18
Your source is a thread posted on a blog website by a user called Laissez-faire Capitalist, who by the way, was reported and blocked from that website. You really think that's a credible source? Come on now, let's use actual empirical sources instead of bullshit opinions. Also, you clearly don't understand anything about feminism so don't even go there.
Ketsan
Ah, you've obviously never used a university reference system before. You see stuff like this: "Donald G. Dutton "Patriarchy and Wife Assault: The Ecological Fallacy Violence and Victims. Vol 9, Number 2., 1994. Page(s) 167-178." That's called a source or a reference; that is an empirical source. "Gwat Yong Lie and Sabrina Gentlewarrior, "Intimate Violence in Lesbian Relationships: Discussion of Survey Findings and Practice Implications, "Journal of Social Service Research 15 (1991): 41-59" That is an empirical source. "Study of 499 ethnically diverse homosexual, bisexual and transgendered teenagers and adults) (Susan C. Turrell "A Descriptive Analysis of same-Sex Relationship Violence for a Diverse Sample" Journal of Family Violence. Vol. 13, 2000. Page(s) 281-293)" That is an empirical source. "(Steinmetz, S.K. A Cross Cultural Comparison of Marital Abuse, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 8, 404-414, 1981)" That is an empirical source; I think I have made my point. So Laissez-faire Capitalist appears to be correct: they have cited empirical sources to back up their argument. Laissez-faire Capitalist obviously went to university and learned to think critically.
I understand that feminism tells lies all the time and I have a whole list of scientific studies, such as the ones cited above, that demonstrate that fact conclusively. It's not just domestic violence, it's the wage gap, it's the bogus "1 in 5 women on campus will be sexually assaulted". There are masses of studies which contradict feminist talking points so to be a feminist is to be a science denialist.
I understand that feminism tells lies all the time and I have a whole list of scientific studies, such as the ones cited above, that demonstrate that fact conclusively. It's not just domestic violence, it's the wage gap, it's the bogus "1 in 5 women on campus will be sexually assaulted". There are masses of studies which contradict feminist talking points so to be a feminist is to be a science denialist.
Madison18
I know what empirical citations look like. But your Laissez-Faire Capitalist author is still not a credible source, and posting it on a conservative blog proves that. He most likely only took statistics that proved the point he believes in (confirmation bias) instead of listing the complete information. Every credible source that I've looked at has opposed the statistics he listed. But it figures that you would use a conservative scumbag as your source considering you're also one.
IFoundYourDiary
oh bully!!! that's not true
IFoundYourDiary
bull ship
IFoundYourDiary
amen and amen
IFoundYourDiary
shut up! apparently you are an Abuser ....!!! counseled enough of you to know every sign..and you're definitely showing bully arrogant narcissistic signs