Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Sarah Brenner, the No. 2 at the FDA, refused the COVID vax

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/05/sarah_brenner_the_no_2_at_the_fda_refused_the_covid_vax.html

Sara Brenner, worked as a career employee at the FDA until she was recently promoted to the No. 2 position under the new FDA Commissioner. Marty Makary. Brenner has recently stated that she never took the COVID vaccine despite it being a requirement for federal employees.

Brenner’s reasoning was that she was pregnant and concerned about the safety of the vaccine for both her and her child. Perhaps she arrived at that conclusion because she’s an expert on nanobiotechnology (although the picture she provided at the link is a curious choice), and therefore had serious and fully legitimate clinical reservations.

The question is why, as an FDA expert and Hippocratic oath-taking physician, she never spoke up earlier to warn other pregnant women about her concerns? This is an especially pointed question because, at the same time, members of the military were resigning or getting fired; and physicians, pharmacists and nurses were resigning or being fired plus being pursued by boards, losing their certifications, licenses, livelihoods, and being mocked by the press and doxxed all over social media.
Top | New | Old
Confined · 56-60, M
Biden Labeled COVID-19 Opposition 'Domestic Violent Extremists'
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declassified intelligence records on Friday, first obtained by Public, showing how the Biden administration gave a designation of "domestic violent extremists" to those in opposition to COVID-19 mandates, such as vaccinations and masking.

Former FBI agent Steve Friend told Public, that the designation was created to open formal investigations into dissenters at the administration's decree.

"Prominent narratives include," the report stated, "the belief that COVID-19 vaccines are unsafe, especially for children, are part of a government or global conspiracy to deprive individuals of their civil liberties and livelihoods, or are designed to start a new social or political order."

Friend said that the vague and all-encompassing report was constructed to censor speech online.

"It's a way they could go to social media companies and say, 'You don't want to propagate domestic terrorism, so you should take down this content."

Speaking to Fox News on Friday, Gabbard explained that "When you look at the language of these documents that I've declassified, first, the strategic implementation plan of the Biden administration's designation of potential violent domestic extremists."

"It really talks about people who may likely turn out to be domestic violent extremists or those who may turn to violence because of these specific 'ideologies' that they hold. And there's a consistent thread through here that these ideologies that they are characterizing as potentially turning into potentially violent activities happen to be people who were using their First Amendment rights to oppose certain policies of the Biden Administration."

Indeed, one section of the document read ambiguously some DVEs opposed to the COVID-19 mandates may "employ a number of techniques, some of which may be criminal, whereas others may constitute the exercise of rights protected by the US Constitution."

But also, "The mere advocacy of political or social positions, political activism, use of strong rhetoric, or generalized philosophic embrace of violent tactics may not constitute violent extremism and are constitutionally protected."

The passage ostensibly allowed the Biden administration to trade on such ambiguity to quash free speech as indicated by other investigations, such as the Twitter Files.

Gabbard added that "Some of the examples that are focused on here have to do with those who oppose the COVID vaccine mandates, those who oppose the mask mandates, and parents who were concerned that their children going to school may be forcibly vaccinated with the COVID vaccine without the consent or awareness of parents."
All the politicians who forced everyone to take it.. even going as far as threatening to remove their kids and freeze their bank accounts were ALL exempt from the clot shot.
Do as we say……. Not as we do.
Why are you behaving like it’s 4 years ago? Nobody cares anymore
Confined · 56-60, M
@blokeinpub I was forced to get it or loose my job. She avoided getting it because she was a federal employee. She forced others to get it but did not do it herself. She needs to go to jail and have her kid taken away.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment