Sad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

QUICK - run to the shelter of your fact--checkers, guys

Shocking post-Covid jab increase in miscarriages and stillbirths

FROM LifeSite News again, a preprint study examining government data has found that, in comparison to the influenza vaccine, the Covid-19 gene-based inoculations produce a 57-fold increase in miscarriages, a 38-fold increase in stillbirth rates, and a 1,200-fold increase in menstrual abnormalities.

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202209.0430/v2
SW-User
Bullshit.

This paper discusses the speed of vaccine rollout and the use of VAERS to access COVID and flu vaccine publicly reported adverse effect differences. The COVID vaccine rollout did occur at a much higher rate and with fewer years of study, but this vaccine type had already been studied for other uses and tried for years previously. The study was also able to move faster because production of the vaccine did not rely on earlier more time-consuming methods of production due to being mRNA-based instead of antigen-based vaccine. The first mRNA therapeutics company was actually founded in 1997. Therefore this therapeutic mode is not as new as the public generally believes it to be.

This study used the VAERS, an open access self-report system of adverse event data, to show a 57-fold increase in miscarriage and an even greater increase in menstrual problems comparing COVID vaccines and Flu vaccines. I used this same system then the miscarriage rate was a 6-fold increase, not 57, completely explainable due to the hysteria that was generated around the vaccine. If you adjust for just 2018-2023 the difference is 22-fold. If you adjust for all vaccines vs COVID the difference is 13-fold. If I you run the same data for just menstrual problems alone the difference is 13-fold. Nowhere is the count as high as described in this paper.

All categories exceed the CDC's 2-fold threshold, but are all self-reported and in direct opposition to a great number of real world studies on pregnant women from around the world, ie. when an actual study is performed, there is no effect of the vaccines, but when we allow literally anyone to log onto their home computer and report, you get this increase.

The reality is, even in countries with excellent healthcare, 1 in 4 pregnancies end in miscarriage. On average there are about 1,000,000 miscarriages per year in the US alone.

The current number reported but not proven to have been caused by the vaccine is 1,381 by my own search using the word "miscarriage" using VAERS, that would be a 0.14% miscarriage rate for the COVID vaccine if you could even prove it was the cause, which you can't.

This study summarizes data for multiple birth and fetal issues, preterm, genetic, and other abnormalities as discrete calculations. But all were reported based on an individual's suspicion, not on any piece of evidence. These are conditions that the general public has difficulty understanding and assigning cause to. In fact, often their own physicians cannot pinpoint the cause. That can make people search for one on their own.

The VAERS does not contain proven effects and cannot be used to prove that any vaccine causes any of the issues reported. In fact to use it, you must click a box saying you understand this before accessing the data. I think no rational person would, before this vaccine hysteria, have self reported their foetuses' and infants' vast array of disorders, as due to the flu vaccine since 80 years of it makes people pretty certain it wouldn't be the cause. But an entirely new virus and vaccine would make people fear it was the cause (although it's clear that you are not a rational person).

The difference in fears surrounding the flu vaccine, in use now for over 80 years, versus a brand new type of vaccine released and in many situations forced onto the public during a pandemic that raged on every screen and infiltrated American lives like no other in history (with the notable exception of the 1918 flu pandemic) is simply incalculable.

But any rational person would consider the fear to be much higher, perhaps 57-fold higher...?
SW-User
@WalterF https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/politifact/ - Findings - Left/Center Bias. Factual reporting High.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-sceptic-bias/ - Findings - Conspiracy Pseudoscience. Bias - Conspiracy Right. Factual reporting - Very Low

Well, it seems that everything to you is opinion if you don't agree with it, so we'll leave it at that.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@SW-User Where do your judgments High and Very low come from? From the "fact-checkers", of course. A vicious circle.

As it seems that everything to you is fact if you agree with it, we'll leave it at that.
SW-User
@WalterF Well, that's fine. If you disagree with fact checkers in general then we'll get nowhere.
therighttothink50 · 56-60, M
"Turbo Cancer" Comes For The Vaccinated
Why are aggressive cancers up 20% among young people around the world?
https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/turbo-cancer-comes-for-the-vaccinated?publication_id=263063&isFreemail=true

Too many doctors and nurses to count in recent months have told me about the alarming rise in sudden cancers in young people since the introduction of the experimental COVID vaccines.
Stories about these sudden deaths by sudden cancer can be found everywhere right now.
Finally, we have confirmation of their anecdotal evidence — thanks to the data wizardry of the Ethical Skeptic.

So, cancer deaths are up 20% — an astonishing figure — in the youngest age groups.

__________________________________________________

Gee whiz, I wonder what could be contributing to this rise in cancers currently taking place?

Go to link for graphic/chart.
Teirdalin · 31-35
WalterF · 70-79, M
@Teirdalin Is that your only remark? Are you real?
Teirdalin · 31-35
@WalterF yep.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@Teirdalin Oh okay

 
Post Comment