Its been a year since I got both of my Covid vaccines and I still haven’t turned into a cyclops. Facebook, you have failed me.
I’m disappointed
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
gol979 · 41-45, M
None of that, just a little gene therapy with zero idea how thats going to play out mid-long term. Maybe you will get away with just getting VAIDS? I also noticed you said youve only had 2? Arent you getting a 3rd, then 4th, 5th and 6th? That 12% efficacy runs out after a week to 0.84%
1-25 of 199
SW-User
@gol979 A little gene therapy 😂. I sure wish it was so I can have super human abilities.
SW-User
@gol979 Maybe you’re thinking of Jean therapy. Because mRNA vaccines have been studied for decades after the SARS outbreak in 2003. It’s a short lived molecule and doesn’t change DNA because it doesn’t enter the cell nucleus. It teaches your body how to recognize covid without putting your cells in harm's way). Then that mRNA is destroyed.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@SW-User yep.....from the same ppl who brought you "safe and effective", had the largest fine for business malpractice, uses humans as guinea pigs etc etc.
Its gene therapy, induces you to create spike proteins, as in hacked your dna. Papers now showing the mrna gets all over the body and is causing serious health issues.
There is zero mid-long term data on these injections and the short term data is at best showing these injections to have zero benefit at worst causing untold damage
Its gene therapy, induces you to create spike proteins, as in hacked your dna. Papers now showing the mrna gets all over the body and is causing serious health issues.
There is zero mid-long term data on these injections and the short term data is at best showing these injections to have zero benefit at worst causing untold damage
SW-User
@gol979 It’s safe and effective because it sucessfully passed each clinical trial phase and has been approved by the FDA. That’s what clinical trials are for, to evaluate whether a drug is effective and safe before it is given to a larger population. If the Covid vaccine wasn’t safe and effective and caused a lot of health problems during the trial, the FDA wouldn’t have approved it.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@SW-User the fda has been coopted by the very institutions its supposed regulate (as always). Its neither safe nor effective. Even the pfizer documents of this ongoing trial state this. They wanted to release this info in 75 years but have been told by a court to release a certain amount each month. It makes for sad reading....we have been lied to on an epic scale
Fairydust · F
Pfizer
Pfraud
Pfizer's own data - released May 2022 - shows the following ..
42,000 out of 46,000 ( 91% ) people reported an adverse reaction
Vaccine efficacy was 12% for 7 days ( NOT 95% ) and then
falls to less than 1% ( 0.84% ) afterwards
They knew there was significant risk to unborn & newborn
babies - but marketed the vaccine as SAFE and EFFECTIVE to
pregnant & nursing women anyway
1,223 people out of 46,000 (~2.7% ) died after taking the vaccine
Pfizer lobbied to have this data hidden for 75 years
NOT SAFE.
. NOT EFFECTIVE.
These facts are tantamount to FRAUD and should
negate any IMMUNITY given to Pfizer.
Pfraud
Pfizer's own data - released May 2022 - shows the following ..
42,000 out of 46,000 ( 91% ) people reported an adverse reaction
Vaccine efficacy was 12% for 7 days ( NOT 95% ) and then
falls to less than 1% ( 0.84% ) afterwards
They knew there was significant risk to unborn & newborn
babies - but marketed the vaccine as SAFE and EFFECTIVE to
pregnant & nursing women anyway
1,223 people out of 46,000 (~2.7% ) died after taking the vaccine
Pfizer lobbied to have this data hidden for 75 years
NOT SAFE.
. NOT EFFECTIVE.
These facts are tantamount to FRAUD and should
negate any IMMUNITY given to Pfizer.
ozgirl512 · 26-30, F
@Fairydust A phase II/III trial of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine enrolled more than 43,000 people aged 12 years or older.
An interim analysis at 2 months after dose 2 reported vaccine efficacy of 95.0% (95% CI: 90.3–97.6) in preventing symptomatic laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in people aged 16 or older years who did not have evidence of previous infection with SARS-CoV-2.1
Short-term vaccine efficacy after a single dose was 52.4% (95% CI: 29.5–68.4). A protective effect was observed starting 12 days after dose 1.
An interim analysis at 2 months after dose 2 reported vaccine efficacy of 95.0% (95% CI: 90.3–97.6) in preventing symptomatic laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in people aged 16 or older years who did not have evidence of previous infection with SARS-CoV-2.1
Short-term vaccine efficacy after a single dose was 52.4% (95% CI: 29.5–68.4). A protective effect was observed starting 12 days after dose 1.
SW-User
@Oster1 The known risks of COVID-19 illness and its related, possibly severe complications, such as long-term health problems, hospitalization and even death, far outweigh the potential risks of having a rare adverse reaction to vaccination like myocarditis or blood clots. So yes she is the one to be laughed at. Just because some people have had an adverse reaction to the Covid vaccine doesn’t make it fraudulent.
Oster1 · M
@SW-User I respect her. I respect you.
We are being bamboozled. The ones, we should be angry with, are the ones, who created this disastrous and hellish attack on the World.
It was not natural. It was a manmade Bio Weapon.
Let's not blame each other. Everyone, was a victim.
We all need to work together, to get out of this mess. 😊🌷
We are being bamboozled. The ones, we should be angry with, are the ones, who created this disastrous and hellish attack on the World.
It was not natural. It was a manmade Bio Weapon.
Let's not blame each other. Everyone, was a victim.
We all need to work together, to get out of this mess. 😊🌷
This message was deleted by its author.
1-25 of 199