Upset
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Proof again, that the US needs a universal health care system

This suggests that a pure capitalistic health care system has serious handicaps. It is almost alwasy a matter of making enough money. Big pharma only is inyterested in big profit medications. Generics do not earn the hige profits.

The shortage evolved from a commonality among the drugs most affected: intravenous formulations of generic drugs that are produced in sterile environments, not very profitable to produce, and generally produced overseas.

"There are 200-300 of these drugs, but a few of them, like carboplatin, are used across many types of cancer," said Iyer. "The [profit] margins are small. With drugs produced overseas, there are supply-chain issues, which can also happen with drugs produced within the U.S. -- weather-related things, geopolitical issues. We see this over and over again."


The shortages have had an impact on treatment planning and scheduling. Of 29 centers that responded to questions on that issue, five reported treatment delays related to drug shortages -- often because of having to submit new prior authorization requests after switching drugs or protocols. Treatment modifications may require a new informed consent and rescheduling treatment at an infusion center, said Iyer.

"All of this puts a strain on the entire system," she said.

As the search for solutions continues, NCCN joined over a dozen other cancer organizations in the End Cancer Drug Shortages Coalition, which recently issued a consensus statement that identified three immediate priorities for addressing the shortages: increasing transparency across the drug supply chain; strengthening incentives for manufacturers to invest in high-quality, redundant supply systems; and stabilizing the generic drug market.

"We still have a long way to go. We need to get all of the stakeholders in the same room and have the necessary conversations," said Iyer.


https://www.medpagetoday.com/hematologyoncology/othercancers/122998?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=copy-link&utm_campaign=mpt-article-share
Top | New | Old
LadyBronte · 61-69, F
The US medical system needs an overhaul. No doubt about that. But in my opinion, free socialized healthcare isn't the answer. There are so many issues. People from other countries that provided free Healthcare to their citizens, often end up coming to the US for treatment. In their own countries, they struggle with getting appointments, getting procedures done, getting treatments and medications. It is a nightmare for so many of the the truly ill who need urgent care. How do I know that? Because as an RN, I've taken care of people who have come to the US for various treatments they could't get in their own country. I have listened to their stories, seen their relief at finally receiving treatment. Healthcare is a mess everywhere and anyone who tries to sell you a bill of goods about how wonderful and amazing free healthcare is, should be horsewhipped. Free is not always good. And free is never actually free.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
val70 · 56-60
The necessity of some sort of a health system is self-evident. In these times where the middle class is not only emptying from the drop of possible income that's one of the buttresses that keeps the whole building up. It's not about the necessary help for the less fortunate in the long run any more but it's all about keeping the economy grounded in the self-employed going.
Waveney · M
At the end of the day, America does not want its citizens to be able to afford healthcare.

Prove me wrong.
GeistInTheMachine · 31-35, M
@Waveney Americans don't want Americans to be able to afford healthcare, lmao.

We're all in competition.
Waveney · M
@GeistInTheMachine either way, my point stands.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Waveney you are partly correct there is one party that has advocated for a universal system and one the opposite. we had a shot at it once, it wasn't perfect but it slowed down the rise in cost, covered many more with better care, sadly the people who benefitted most from it were gaslit to think it was a bad approach and they actually voted against their own interest.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@GeistInTheMachine In the US the concept of employer-provided medical care was for companies to compete for workers after WWII. The argument has evolved into whether medical/health care is included as a right or a privilege. Until it is accepted to be a right of every citizen, we are at the mercy of the big insurers, whose CEOS make mega salaries and are interested only in their bottom lines.
Nick1 · 61-69, M
There is one simple effective solution. Take away special healthcare from politicians and bring them to common system. Then see how quickly it gets fixed.
GeistInTheMachine · 31-35, M
@Nick1 The politicians own the military. With what army is anyone going to take healthcare away from them?

Everything comes down to the gun barrel and who owns it.
Adrift · 61-69, F
I remember a day when you could shop for plans that were affordable based on your needs, had a reasonable deductible and could actually get in to see a physician when you needed to see one.
If you needed to see a specialist, labs or, imaging, the doctor would order it.
After your deductible was met, the insurance paid a percentage and you paid what wasnt covered by insurance.
I also remember that system changing once they started screwing around with these new and improved "Managed Healthcare" that somehow evolved into "Affordable Healthcare."
Which is not too affordable and only managed to put Healthcare back onto the kitchen table.
again we disagree. Dems only push for Universal healthcare because they see the opportunity for massive fraud and a way to put money in their pockets. just look at all the medicaid fraud and where the majority of it is, can you say BLUE STATES
@samueltyler2 all society needs quality healthcare on that we agree. on a different note, have you ever been to the feast of San Genaro in the city which starts this weekend. everyone should experience it at least once
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@saragoodtimes we lived in the lower east side when that entire area was truly Little Italy. It isnt what it once was. It is now yuppified, and the neighboring ethnics have spread into it. Jews snd Italians have a lot of similarities including the closeness of both early sections of lower Manhattan.

I am happy to see you agree about a few things. I have to log off now.
@samueltyler2 it's the one thing I miss about this time of year and going to the feast
helenS · 36-40, F
In my opinion, a mixed system is best: with private insurances for the rich and a statutory health insurance for the not-so-rich. The statutory insurance must cover everything, even things which are not considered to be diseases. Pregnancy, for example.
Midlifemale · 61-69, M
Universal ? Run by the government ?
Look at other countries that have that. I read that Canada's system is terrible.
Our pricing needs to be controlled for sure. It is out of control.
Maybe Universal, and Universal pricing, but not rum by the government....maybe the feds set rules on the profits made...which are way too high
AthrillatheHunt · 56-60, M
Our nations healthcare is similar to our prison system . Both for profit. Both wanna keep you a loyal customer for life without actually helping you lead a normal life or cure/ rehabilitate you .

 
Post Comment