Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

More evidence against COVID being weapon or unintentional release

A very interesting article in the peer-reviewed journal

first the article in the NY Times

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/09/science/covid-coronavirus-evolution.html?unlocked_article_code=1.SVA.bzd3.NxG2hbEvChbU&smid=url-share

"If SARS-CoV-2 was reared in a lab, its mutations would unfold in a pattern like that of the Russian flu. Instead, Dr. Wertheim and his colleagues found, its mutation pattern matched the five naturally occurring outbreaks they studied.

Instead, Dr. Wertheim said, Covid appears to have arisen from some really bad luck. As the precursor virus was adapting to infect bats, it ended up ready to start a pandemic among people. “It’s coincidentally exceptionally good at being a human virus,” Dr. Wertheim said."

the article as referenced

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2026.02.006

Highlights

Viral adaptation is not a necessary precursor to outbreaks of novel zoonotic viruses

Selection signatures on SARS-CoV-2 were unchanged until its emergence in humans

Laboratory and gain-of-function passage produce distinct evolutionary signatures

1977 influenza virus reemergence preceded by evolution consistent with laboratory passage
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
jeancolby · 31-35, F
You should get a medal for your explainations. However since most people cant balance a check book your science goes completly over their heads.