Exactly. All suicides were ruled covid deaths also. All fatalities in accidents were ruled covid. I still cant believe so many including doctors went along with this nonsense.
@Confined There was the issue of "died with covid v died from covid." We know the PCR produced far too many false positives to be reliable, and the gov't incented the medical community with additional $$ for covid diagnosises, hospitalizations, putting people in ventilators.
You can't reason with these people. Even when the government and intelligence agencies are proven to have lied in the past or outright admit to it people defend the system and say there's no proof they're still corrupt. Which is a conspiracy theory in itself.
@Rolexeo it’s pride at this point me thinks.. some ppl are just far too intelligent to be duped.. therefore Theyl double down now until the very end.. 😑
It was all propaganda there was nothing but the flu and they exaggerated it to high hell and used the pretense for population control and lock downs. It was pure bs evil they forced on us and killed people in the hospitals too with suffocation
2x this MoFo has poisoned the planet and denied us any useful treatment. and pushed a useless treatment he himself was heavily invested in.. AZT and Remdesivir + ventilators for covid. and dont question mr. science..
Ummm...it was your analogy, and it was invalid. But now it doesn't matter because you "say so" right?
Why wouldn't it lose its championship belt?
Simple, the collective data doesn't support it. At no point in history has the flu nearly disappeared because another virus miraculously appeared. It has its highs and lows, but it doesn't go away. Kinda like you 😂
Instead, we're just supposed to accept the flu miraculously disappeared, or nearly disappeared or ooops, the gov't numbers change yet again.
So...we have 15,000 cases, 1.9 million cases, and 11 million cases. Gee, I wonder which it is? Or will they revise things again? Had the gov't agencies led with the last number, we wouldn't be having this little chat.
@BizSuitStacy Your reason for it being invalid is because they are predators but them being predators doesn't undermine the basic principle that they are both scenarios that entail a competition of resources. You have yet to tell me how this is not a competition. You are barely following what I'm telling you. I'm still committed to the bear comparison. It's your idea of why them being predators makes a difference to the comparison that doesn't matter because you haven't demonstrated why it should. You can't just say it's apples and oranges when the comparison has relevance. Explain why they aren't in competition for a place in your body when the presence of either not only takes up physical space but also triggers alarms against the other and sometimes one of them will kill you before the other can even get to you, the same way the bears do. And do not tell me the outlier line about being able to have both at the same time again. I've already asked you why we should let exceptional circumstance define the general and usual outcome that having an immune response protects you from other threats while you deal with the other. You still haven't answered that so you aren't allowed to bring it up unless you do.
What makes you think that all those other times the flu had something to challenge it that it was on the same level and ability as covid? How have you ruled this out as a possibility?
