According to the CDC
In order to prevent one teen ager dying from covid they have to vax injure 200,000 teen agers. Does that seem like a good trade off to you? This applies to the Moderna Vax.
61-69, M
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
BizSuitStacy · M
Safe & Effective?
CDC just recommended the updated jab for ages 6 months and up. Their test...50, count 'em 50 people. Even though it's recommended for children of 6 months and up, no one under the age of 12 was tested.
Success criteria. No one died. Oh yay 🙄
There was an 8% injury rate, but that's ok. Of course, no one knows the long term impact.
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/do-you-know-what-safe-and-effective?r=1cmbts
CDC just recommended the updated jab for ages 6 months and up. Their test...50, count 'em 50 people. Even though it's recommended for children of 6 months and up, no one under the age of 12 was tested.
Success criteria. No one died. Oh yay 🙄
There was an 8% injury rate, but that's ok. Of course, no one knows the long term impact.
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/do-you-know-what-safe-and-effective?r=1cmbts
View 4 more replies »
AbbySvenz · F
Unfortunately, no 🙄@SumKindaMunster
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@AbbySvenz Then you don't need me to tell you what to expect.
AbbySvenz · F
Oh, no, definitely not!@SumKindaMunster
UnderLockDown · M
TrashCat · M
You got a link to that claim so we can read it ourselves?
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@TrashCat well I suppose if you went to the CDC website and looked ....
MarineBob · 56-60, M
CDC Foundation has more than 10 years of cash that they may spend without government oversight
Natasmai · 56-60
Really?
Natasmai · 56-60
@StevetheSleeve ah, I see!