Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Piper · 61-69, F
I would not be afraid to answer to answer honestly, with or without a poll. I think any comparison between Adolf Hitler and Dr. Anthony Fauci, regarding "atrocities against humanity", is absurd.
Hitler undeniably and with specific and clear intent, was responsible for the suffering and death of [b]millions[/b] of people.
Hitler undeniably and with specific and clear intent, was responsible for the suffering and death of [b]millions[/b] of people.
Piper · 61-69, F
@Freeranger It would be futile to argue further, with someone who refers to the deliberate, planned "extermination" and suffering of so many...as [i]just[/i] war.
Freeranger · M
I am biased of course. My grandfather died at 53 as a Merchant Marine Engineer at the hand of a Nazi U-boat during WWII. So, you can assume how I'll answer. When I look objectively at the choices and having read so much of history, in my personal estimation I'm not sure how anyone could not come to the conclusion of Hitler.
And here's the interesting contemplative facet. Just think, ,,,,,,,,,during WWI, when Hitler was a no-name private on the battlefield, had an Allied soldier lined him up in their sights and shot him dead....think of the millions who would have gone on to do good things in the world, the positive discoveries and accomplishments that might have been realize globally.
That aside
Let's re-create a controlled experiment. Put 16 travelling salesman in a room [i]just[/i] tbefore a flight and tell them they cannot jump on that flight without a shot record immunization card in their possession.
In the second scenario, choose 16 willing volunteers. March them out along a wood line, and then instruct them to kneel in front of a deep trench while men with rifles file in behind them.
Shut down the experiment, and ask them how phreaked they were.
Personally, I don't see how it's even close.
And here's the interesting contemplative facet. Just think, ,,,,,,,,,during WWI, when Hitler was a no-name private on the battlefield, had an Allied soldier lined him up in their sights and shot him dead....think of the millions who would have gone on to do good things in the world, the positive discoveries and accomplishments that might have been realize globally.
That aside
Let's re-create a controlled experiment. Put 16 travelling salesman in a room [i]just[/i] tbefore a flight and tell them they cannot jump on that flight without a shot record immunization card in their possession.
In the second scenario, choose 16 willing volunteers. March them out along a wood line, and then instruct them to kneel in front of a deep trench while men with rifles file in behind them.
Shut down the experiment, and ask them how phreaked they were.
Personally, I don't see how it's even close.
@Freeranger War is war, while unfortunate, not an atrocity. Funding an experimental virus that claimed millions of lives is an atrocity. That is how it could be debated.
Fauci killed more people and it was not even wartime.
