IF of course the quotes are fair and accurate, given we don't know their contexts and qualifying comments by the same people...
.... I am surprised Drs. Fauci and Walensky would say that, but perhaps just as surprisingly, at least Bill Gates is nearer the facts than the rest.
I think I can see what Bourla means but he might have worded it a bit better! The vaccines are meant to protect us, not the virii!
"No we know..,." Do we? I have no idea if Maddow is a experienced science and medicine journalist, a general reporter or simply the news-reader; nor can I judge MSNBC's probity or know if she said that[i] as part of [/i]a clear statement of personal opinion or within a news report. it's certainly not correct because SARS_CoVid_19 and its brothers, wherever they came from (still not known for sure) like humans and are here to stay... just as are poliomyelitis, tetanus and various others diseases most of us have been vaccinated against without all this pseudo-political campaigning. Even Bubonic Plague is still about, though rare.
Re Gates' comment: The anti-vaccine, pro-disease lobby seem to think themselves immune and immortal, and not to care about infecting other people.
Frankly, rogues' galleries of mug-shots and carefully-plucked opinions are about as sincere and reliable as 'Happy Christmas from President Xi'.
@ArishMell This was a recording made of an MEP speaking during a session of the parliament. Not anything else! Not a trailer for her latest book, not a press conference... That should be clear from the video?
Probably not a scientist, but not a simpleton either. She will have done a lot of research before reaching these conclusions, with the confidence to present them before a fairly distinguished public.
(Please remember that "doing research" does not mean making notes from newspaper and TV reports. It means disregarding the fact-checkers' blanket rubbishing of all non-compliant sources, no matter how qualified and experienced they are. It means realising that censorship is going on, and penetrating the barriers, to find hidden facts and the TRUTH)
@WalterF Sorry - I did not realise it was from a video; but please do explain who is censoring what for whose benefit, and how do you know they are doing it and how you know for whom!
(I appreciate politicians will put a slant on things for partisanship, and obviously commercial interests are trying to sell us something.)
@ArishMell Three years of research, prompted by the suspicion right from the start that this whole business wasn't as clear cut as they said, has led me to the 100% certainty that it has all been engineered, AGAINST the interests of the ordinary person.
I will send you more info by PM. But to do the research you have to be brave, and persistent. The firewall is so strong that you will be tempted to give in.
Here's an example. Below is the mini-cv of one Mike Adams. Not an unaccomplished person. Yet look him up on Google and the first entries will (I'm certain) warn you to stay away from this man who has the audacity to "peddle" (fact-checkers' favourite word) "quack cures" (another favourite), and therefore must be avoided! (Remember that natural remedies make not a single cent for BigPharma.)
