Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Publication showing Ivermectin of no use treating COVID

Another science-based report that the use of ivermectin is not indicated in treating mild to moderate covid infections. When will the non-scientists start believing in science?

IMPORTANCE The effectiveness of ivermectin to shorten symptom duration or prevent
hospitalization among outpatients in the US with mild to moderate symptomatic
COVID-19 is unknown.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of ivermectin, 400 μg/kg, daily for 3 days compared with
placebo for the treatment of early mild to moderate COVID-19.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS ACTIV-6, an ongoing, decentralized, double-blind,
randomized, placebo-controlled platform trial, was designed to evaluate repurposed
therapies in outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19. A total of 1591 participants aged 30
years and older with confirmed COVID-19, experiencing 2 or more symptoms of acute
infection for 7 days or less, were enrolled from June 23, 2021, through February 4, 2022,
with follow-up data through May 31, 2022, at 93 sites in the US.
INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized to receive ivermectin, 400 μg/kg (n = 817),
daily for 3 days or placebo (n = 774).
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Time to sustained recovery, defined as at least 3
consecutive days without symptoms. There were 7 secondary outcomes, including
a composite of hospitalization or death by day 28.
RESULTS Among 1800 participants who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 48 [12] years; 932
women [58.6%]; 753 [47.3%] reported receiving at least 2 doses of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine),
1591 completed the trial. The hazard ratio (HR) for improvement in time to recovery was 1.07
(95%credible interval [CrI], 0.96-1.17; posterior P value [HR >1] = .91). The median time to
recovery was 12 days (IQR, 11-13) in the ivermectin group and 13 days (IQR, 12-14) in the
placebo group. There were 10 hospitalizations or deaths in the ivermectin group and 9 in the
placebo group (1.2%vs 1.2%; HR, 1.1 [95%CrI, 0.4-2.6]). The most common serious adverse
events were COVID-19 pneumonia (ivermectin [n = 5]; placebo [n = 7]) and venous
thromboembolism (ivermectin [n = 1]; placebo [n = 5]).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19,
treatment with ivermectin, compared with placebo, did not significantly improve time to
recovery. These findings do not support the use of ivermectin in patients with mild
to moderate COVID-19.
TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04885530
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
You can’t prove Covid exists.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@MrBrownstone what! Are you serious? That is among the craziest statements ever. It can be seen via electron microscope, grown in tissue culture, there he ave even been studies using viral cultures of it to infect volunteers. How dare you say i can't prove it exists!
Tminus6453 · M
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
@samueltyler2 See what I mean. You didn’t prove it. You just said what you saw online.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@MrBrownstone what are you saying? I never said any of that. I admit i personally didn't look in the microscope. I did treat patients suffering with the disease, i have read medical/scientific articles about the virus and it's effects. What source are you quoting that the virus that has killed millions of people worldwide, continues to kill over 300 US citizens every day, doesn't exist?
OggggO · 36-40, M
@MrBrownstone https://www.npr.org/2020/02/13/805837103/images-what-new-coronavirus-looks-like-under-the-microscope
https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/novel-coronavirus-structure-reveals-targets-vaccines-treatments
https://www.modernhealthcare.com/safety-quality/scientist-captures-coronavirus-images-microscope
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
@samueltyler2 Talking about flu?
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@MrBrownstone no, i said i am talking about COVID, and you are off subject and out of line. Get a life.
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
@samueltyler2 Sure it’s not the same thing?
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@MrBrownstone i hope you are not serious, of course i am sure. In fact, i am worried that we might have an outbreak where both viruses are common in the population. We have no idea what a confection would be like. Early in covid, we did see confections with other respiratory viruses, those patients did seem to do worse than those with just COVID. I hope others reading this learns from it, because it appears that your brain has been so affected by false information that you are unable to process or accept the truth.
luckranger71 · 51-55, M
@MrBrownstone
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@luckranger71 he doesn't need help, he isn't brainwashed
iamonfire696 · 41-45, F
@samueltyler2 he’s stupid, don’t pay any attention to him.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@iamonfire696 yes, but, others reading this post might not be stupid, just ill informed, i somehow feel I owe it to them to state the facts, the truths, not the crazy theories of those who believe in conspiracies.
iamonfire696 · 41-45, F
@samueltyler2 they believe in the conspiracy theories though.

At this point with all the data collected if they can’t see that ivermectin doesn’t work then they truly are the sheep being led here.

They are for a political party that wants to take away rights and they don’t even see that. That’s how blind they are. They can have their ivermectin, it’s not going to save them. You and I both know this.
tindrummer · M
@samueltyler2 he's baiting you - don't give him the satisfaction
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@tindrummer i usually ignore the stupidity of SW posters, I figure more than 50% are bots anyway, but, I am afraid that when lies are repeated too often, without correction, too many people start believing them!