Covid-19-vaccine-was-never-tested-to-prevent-transmission
https://www-theblaze-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/www.theblaze.com/amp/pfizer-executive-admits-covid-19-vaccine-was-never-tested-to-prevent-transmission-this-is-scandalous-2658426878
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
pdockal · 56-60, M
When was it tested for anything ?????
ElwoodBlues · M
@pdockal Summer and autumn of 2020.
"Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine"
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2035389
Conclusions
The mRNA-1273 vaccine showed 94.1% efficacy at preventing Covid-19 illness, including severe disease. Aside from transient local and systemic reactions, no safety concerns were identified. (Funded by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; COVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04470427.)
"Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine"
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2034577
Conclusions
A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccines. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728.)
Moderna animal trials
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2024671
Pfizer animal trials
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03275-y
"Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine"
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2035389
Conclusions
The mRNA-1273 vaccine showed 94.1% efficacy at preventing Covid-19 illness, including severe disease. Aside from transient local and systemic reactions, no safety concerns were identified. (Funded by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; COVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04470427.)
"Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine"
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2034577
Conclusions
A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccines. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728.)
Moderna animal trials
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2024671
Pfizer animal trials
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03275-y
pdockal · 56-60, M
@ElwoodBlues
I don't think so
You can spew what ever so called statistics you want
They rushed it to market
Tell me how they know the long long term ejects of the shot in such short a time frame
With or without the shot i can get covid
With or without the shot i can give it to you
With or without the shot i can get sick
With or without the shot i can die
If it protects like it should and you get the shot why do i need it
Those of us who didn't get the shot aren't getting it more then those without the shot
Which varient will you need a shot for next
If the numbers are down its because it ran its course
I've had it
Loved ones gotten it
Friends have gotten it after the shot
Most that got the shot had side affects
Some had horrible side effects
Think I'm reading that the side effects are more common and dangerous then we were led to beleive
I don't think so
You can spew what ever so called statistics you want
They rushed it to market
Tell me how they know the long long term ejects of the shot in such short a time frame
With or without the shot i can get covid
With or without the shot i can give it to you
With or without the shot i can get sick
With or without the shot i can die
If it protects like it should and you get the shot why do i need it
Those of us who didn't get the shot aren't getting it more then those without the shot
Which varient will you need a shot for next
If the numbers are down its because it ran its course
I've had it
Loved ones gotten it
Friends have gotten it after the shot
Most that got the shot had side affects
Some had horrible side effects
Think I'm reading that the side effects are more common and dangerous then we were led to beleive