This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ElwoodBlues · M
Ivermectin was tested via the gold standard double blind method. Here's a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, adaptive platform trial involving 3515 symptomatic SARS-CoV-2–positive adults recruited from 12 public health clinics in Brazil.
Translation: Ivermectin did nothing against Covid.
And while we're on the subject, let's look at another favorite of Trumpsters - hydroxychloroquin.
Randomized double blind placebo controlled study shows HCQ (hydroxychloroquin) does nothing for Covid-19 with or without AZ (azithromycin)
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30389-8/fulltext
Also see https://wtop.com/national/2020/06/malaria-drug-fails-to-prevent-covid-19-in-a-rigorous-study/
A MUCH BIGGER retrospective study (96,000) was done by the US Veterans Admin https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/500021-va-hospitals-drop-hydroxychloroquine-as-coronavirus-treatment
Not that science is gonna convince most Trumpsters. They deny evolution, climatology, and the geological age of the Earth. So they have no problem denying epidemiology and immunology too!!
Conclusions
Treatment with ivermectin did not result in a lower incidence of medical admission to a hospital due to progression of Covid-19 or of prolonged emergency department observation among outpatients with an early diagnosis of Covid-19.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869Treatment with ivermectin did not result in a lower incidence of medical admission to a hospital due to progression of Covid-19 or of prolonged emergency department observation among outpatients with an early diagnosis of Covid-19.
Translation: Ivermectin did nothing against Covid.
And while we're on the subject, let's look at another favorite of Trumpsters - hydroxychloroquin.
Randomized double blind placebo controlled study shows HCQ (hydroxychloroquin) does nothing for Covid-19 with or without AZ (azithromycin)
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30389-8/fulltext
Also see https://wtop.com/national/2020/06/malaria-drug-fails-to-prevent-covid-19-in-a-rigorous-study/
A MUCH BIGGER retrospective study (96,000) was done by the US Veterans Admin https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/500021-va-hospitals-drop-hydroxychloroquine-as-coronavirus-treatment
VA has almost completely stopped prescribing an anti-malaria drug touted by President Trump to veterans with COVID-19 after studies questioned its efficacy in treating the disease.
Not that science is gonna convince most Trumpsters. They deny evolution, climatology, and the geological age of the Earth. So they have no problem denying epidemiology and immunology too!!
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
ElwoodBlues · M
@SumKindaMunster I guess you can't handle facts and links to double blind scientific studies, LOL!!!
Oh wait, I get it, you can't refute the data, so you attack the messenger! What fallacy is that?? Oh,

Oh wait, I get it, you can't refute the data, so you attack the messenger! What fallacy is that?? Oh,

This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
ElwoodBlues · M
@SumKindaMunster You whined about my highly factual post and accused me of being triggered. I still don't know why. But responding to facts with a personal attack is the very definition of an ad hominem fallacy. I don't know why you keep jumping on my threads, is it because you desire attention from me??