Upset
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
Also, fail, the vaccine doesn't contain grapheme at all:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/07/10/graphene-oxide-in-pfizer-covid-19-vaccines-here-are-the-latest-unsupported-claims/
MarineBob · 56-60, M
@basilfawlty89 By the time their reports are released my grandkids will be retired
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
@MarineBob it doesn't matter of the reports are released or not, the components of the vaccine are public knowledge, furthermore there is no graphene in it.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@basilfawlty89 You believe in Forbes, you believe in Father Christmas. Ask Fauci too while you're at it - he'll swear blind there's no graphene in the potions. Get real, man - you think they're interested in people's wellbeing?

THIS IS A WAR, with a full frontal two-year long and continuing wall to wall PROPAGANDA apparatus firing salvo after salvo at all the western peoples via the media and social media, with its ubiquitous "fact-checkers", also known as truth-deniers. Don't be taken in! or is it too late for you?
WalterF · 70-79, M
@basilfawlty89 It's graphene, Baz, not grapheme. Look it up.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@basilfawlty89 Graphene oxide would anyway be either carbon-monoxide or carbon dioxide - and no vaccine contains a gas!

Graphene is only a physical form of carbon, after all... but how many of those at whom that nasty twaddle was aimed, would know that?
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
@WalterF So let me get this straight. I have a typo from an autocorrect, and you choose to focus on that, even though the article points out your nonsense about graphene oxide being in the vaccine is nonsense?

What you're literally saying is you refuse to trust any news source that goes against your own biases and beliefs. You basically refuse to listen to anything that goes beyond your preconceived notions and things you think is right, regardless of the data.

We call that delusion, Walter.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@basilfawlty89 I have said all I need to say to you, Basil, over several comments in the last hour or so. (The remark about spelling was a throwaway... though, errm, if your autocorrect made the mistake, my suspicions were founded...) Nothing more to be said.

I bid you goodnight, and if our paths don't cross again, all the very best for the future for you and your loved ones
This post is closed and no longer available for commenting.