All three vaccines are safe
I know because the government says so.
No other time was you ever offered a choice on what manufacturer you wanted
No other time was you ever offered a choice on what manufacturer you wanted
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Elessar · 31-35, M
@TexChik That's a pretty terrible source that clearly hates America as a whole, not only it's hating on the present administration vaccination program, but is also quite clearly calling Trump's warp speed effort "vaccine hoax".
Seriously though, the claims in that "article" have zero scientific foundation.
Vaccinated people get sick for much shorter and the infection is usually (96% of the times) mild, this datum is being observed in any country in which mRNA vaccines are being administrated, including but not only the U.S.; therefore by simple logic (and biology) the vaccinated can't transmit more than the unvaccinated who are infectious for much longer, at the very worst they can transmit just as much.
Second, they can't be more likely to generate variants for the same reason; variants originate from random errors during the virus reproductive cycle, in a host where more replication cycles occurs (i.e. the disease lasts longer, spreads to multiple organs, etc. - i.e. unvaccinated individual) by a simple matter of probability, there are more chances for a new variation to emerge than in an individual in which the number of replication cycles is interrupted by a much quicker immune response (also reason why the great majority of the vaccinated tend not to get severe; the infection doesn't normally spread out of the upper respiratory system, and lasts a bunch of days at most, not 2+ weeks).
Also, if 96% of the immunized people don't get severe, once everyone is immunized in one way or the other, who cares if they're superspreaders of something that will have no more harm potential? Literally in every country the great majority of people who get hospitalized due to covid are unvaxxed.
Seriously though, the claims in that "article" have zero scientific foundation.
Vaccinated people get sick for much shorter and the infection is usually (96% of the times) mild, this datum is being observed in any country in which mRNA vaccines are being administrated, including but not only the U.S.; therefore by simple logic (and biology) the vaccinated can't transmit more than the unvaccinated who are infectious for much longer, at the very worst they can transmit just as much.
Second, they can't be more likely to generate variants for the same reason; variants originate from random errors during the virus reproductive cycle, in a host where more replication cycles occurs (i.e. the disease lasts longer, spreads to multiple organs, etc. - i.e. unvaccinated individual) by a simple matter of probability, there are more chances for a new variation to emerge than in an individual in which the number of replication cycles is interrupted by a much quicker immune response (also reason why the great majority of the vaccinated tend not to get severe; the infection doesn't normally spread out of the upper respiratory system, and lasts a bunch of days at most, not 2+ weeks).
Also, if 96% of the immunized people don't get severe, once everyone is immunized in one way or the other, who cares if they're superspreaders of something that will have no more harm potential? Literally in every country the great majority of people who get hospitalized due to covid are unvaxxed.
Elessar · 31-35, M
@TexChik Uhm yes, why wouldn't it be? Addressing factually inaccurate statements is "writing a pro-lib book"? I told you, I couldn't care less of neoliberalisms.
We're in a public commentary section of a public post, as per the site ToS everyone can comment wherever they think it is appropriate, without violating the other terms. You have several means if you want to keep your posts "safe" from any criticism - either limiting the scope of your posts to your circle, or straight blocking literally anyone whose vision differs from yours.
We're in a public commentary section of a public post, as per the site ToS everyone can comment wherever they think it is appropriate, without violating the other terms. You have several means if you want to keep your posts "safe" from any criticism - either limiting the scope of your posts to your circle, or straight blocking literally anyone whose vision differs from yours.
