This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
BizSuitStacy · M
so safe, the gov't wants to force the "vaccines" on everyone.
1-25 of 116
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
MarineBob · 61-69, M
@BizSuitStacy how many current food recalls are there that is FDA approved
rachelsj · 22-25, F
@BizSuitStacy not fda approved yet
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@MarineBob Do you honestly think you’re making sense right now? Food recalls happen when something goes wrong in the manufacturing process, yes. Yet you still eat food, I imagine.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@MarineBob Full approval is basically here, why would you say something you already know is wrong?
Elessar · 31-35, M
@QuixoticSoul Breatharianism man
BizSuitStacy · M
@rachelsj Correct. Vaccines require years of testing to assess the risks of long term side effects. FDA approval will come as a rubber stamp.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@BizSuitStacy No, long term side effect stuff is phase 4 - and is done after approval and manufacture. Only phase 3 is needed for full approval.
Trials generally take a long time because it’s hard to find the right people. Because covid is ubiquitous, everyone is the right test subject, and our major vaccines all had tens of thousands of test subject ready to go for phase 3 before it even started.
Trials generally take a long time because it’s hard to find the right people. Because covid is ubiquitous, everyone is the right test subject, and our major vaccines all had tens of thousands of test subject ready to go for phase 3 before it even started.
Elessar · 31-35, M
@BizSuitStacy No, vaccine requires clinical trials, the time it takes to complete one varies for every disease, and depends mostly on how long it takes to the control group to get infected. On top of that, in ordinary times you begin mass-producing a drug only when the trial is completed, in an emergency the funding is high enough that these phases are parallelized, taking the risk of having to throw away everything later on if the trials are unsuccessful. It's been explained so many times that there are only two reasons why someone would ignore it at this point in time: either being completely brain-dead, and unable to comprehend the concept, or being in bad faith.
BizSuitStacy · M
@QuixoticSoul Didn't say they won't get FDA approval.
I said it's a rubber stamp and the potential long term side effects are unknown.
I said it's a rubber stamp and the potential long term side effects are unknown.
Elessar · 31-35, M
@BizSuitStacy The alternative to potential (never yet observed in one year) are *certain* permanent/long-term side effect from the disease itself.
BizSuitStacy · M
@Elessar it's been explained so many times? LOL. Do you memorize and parrot the talking points? Can you prove the vaccines are safe? No. Do you know the potential long term side effects? No. Are there alternative effective treatments for covid? Yes. 🐑
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@BizSuitStacy Potential long term side effects are investigated during phase 4, after approval and manufacture. This is normal.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@BizSuitStacy Yeah ICUs the country over are clogged with unvaccinated patients trying out experimental treatments, also under FDA emergency authorization.
Vaccines appear quite safe at this stage, after full sets of clinical trials, and millions of doses distributed.
You know what we know has serious long term side effects for many? Covid.
Vaccines appear quite safe at this stage, after full sets of clinical trials, and millions of doses distributed.
You know what we know has serious long term side effects for many? Covid.
Elessar · 31-35, M
@BizSuitStacy Yes, it was. Over and over. To deaf ears, or ears disconnected from brains apparently.
No, although I'm asked the same dumb question in over one year, you should at least renew your repertory, once in a while. Don't complain if you get the same answers if you pose the same questions.
No, but you're ignoring that the alternative is certain side effects for a significant slice of the population. Therefore, among "potential but never seen as of yet" and "certain in 1/4 of the infected", anyone with a brain will choose the former.
Which are these "alternative treatments"? HCQ, being praised by every rightard in the world, yet they never have it in their therapeutic plan once they get themselves sick - look how much HCQ has been given to Trump when he was sick, zero (0).
I don't even call you sheep because by doing so I would offend the ovis.
No, although I'm asked the same dumb question in over one year, you should at least renew your repertory, once in a while. Don't complain if you get the same answers if you pose the same questions.
No, but you're ignoring that the alternative is certain side effects for a significant slice of the population. Therefore, among "potential but never seen as of yet" and "certain in 1/4 of the infected", anyone with a brain will choose the former.
Which are these "alternative treatments"? HCQ, being praised by every rightard in the world, yet they never have it in their therapeutic plan once they get themselves sick - look how much HCQ has been given to Trump when he was sick, zero (0).
I don't even call you sheep because by doing so I would offend the ovis.
MarineBob · 61-69, M
@QuixoticSoul but dmx was okay with an icu room for a drug overdose
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@MarineBob Yes, people end up in the ICU for all sorts of reasons, that’s why we have them - and that’s also why the flood of covid patients puts the whole system under strain. There are whole states where you really don’t want to get into a car accident or have a stroke right now.
BizSuitStacy · M
@Elessar four legs good, two legs bad, right?
Elessar · 31-35, M
@BizSuitStacy Actually more like "one brain good, zero brains bad". The ovis have better self-preservation skills of brainless antivaxxers therefore yeah, it'd be insulting to the former comparing the two.
BizSuitStacy · M
@Elessar Your "talking points" are remarkably similar to two of your other comrades on other threads. Glad you all got the same memo. 🐑
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
BizSuitStacy · M
@Elessar Can't defend the fact that the gene therapies masquerading as vaccines are experimental and the long term effects are unknown. Those be the facts. In typical a liberal response, losers like you resort to insults. Way to go 🐑
Elessar · 31-35, M
@BizSuitStacy If you knew anything about what you were speaking of, you wouldn't be filling your mouth with BS you heard on Facebook, notably "gene therapy". You needed indeed genetic therapy, when you were born, that would've prevented you from growing without a brain.
Last but not least, no one forces anyone to take mRNA shots. Go take Astrazeneca or J&J if you're so concerned about risks that don't exist.
Last but not least, no one forces anyone to take mRNA shots. Go take Astrazeneca or J&J if you're so concerned about risks that don't exist.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@BizSuitStacy These are not gene therapies. No genes are being inserted.
1-25 of 116








