Sad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

No-one is safe, until everyone is safe: a nonsense slogan. Did you fall for it?

Dissecting the slogan in the covid vaccine context:
[/b]
“No-one is safe until….”. This means the vaccine does not protect the vaccinated against the disease it is aimed at. If it did, then they would be safe. That is how vaccines are supposed to work. The WHO is claiming that Covid-19 vaccines don’t work to protect the injected.

“…until everyone is safe.” Protecting one person by vaccinating another requires the vaccine to block transmission. But if there is one thing all sides accept about the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines, it is that the vaccinated can still transmit.

So, this slogan makes no sense in the Covid context, and if anything is an ‘anti-vax’ statement.

As for the six- foot-distancing rule, Dr Fauci, aka "The Science", has confessed that it had no scientific base or raison d'être.

They took us for idiots!

Ever been played by your government?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ArishMell · 70-79, M
It does make sense.

A vaccination greatly reduces the chance of its recipient falling seriously ill from the illness, but that individual can still infect others.

I don't know who coined the two-metre rule (or 6' if you are American so 6" closer) but was it Dr. Fauci or politicians?

You really do love to try to persuade everyone that none shall be protected from disease. You also love to despise the World Health Organisation for the sake of it. Why?
SW-User
@ArishMell

The vaccines didn’t work, ffs 🤦🏼‍♀️ they lied and they said you won’t get covid if you’re vaccinated! They then changed what they said.


A vaccination greatly reduces the chance of its recipient falling seriously ill from the illness, but that individual can still infect others

Everyone I know that was vaccinated got it bad, everyone that wasn’t didn’t get as sick.

You believe the tv 📺 clown world. 🤡
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@SW-User I do know a friend of mine died from Covid, admittedly on top of existing illness; but though I know one particular make of vaccine seems to have been found hazardous (or faulty?) no-one else among the many people I know was seriously ill from either the vaccine or the disease itself.

I think one or two said they had odd side-effects from the first injection, as I did, but they were short-term and not really surprising. I'd have been more worried really, if I'd had no reaction at all!

I have been vaccinated three or four times now against SARS_Covid_19; plus against Influenza annually, Pneumonia and Shingles a year or so ago; plus against Poliomyelitis, Tubercolosis, Diptheria and Tetanus when very young. So too with nearly everyone I know. Strange how we are all still alive.

I don't watch circuses on telly - I don't have a TV anyway - but I would not presume to learn health precautions from a circus! Nor from [anti?]-social-media.

Meanwhile, Covid is still putting people in hospital...
SW-User
@ArishMell

Well you’re fortunate to not have anyone poorly after having them. I have 6 now in my family that have been affected by them.
17 million are said to have died from the vaccines, probably more.
So many are being silenced, death rates have increased dramatically since the rollout.

Look into it, died suddenly.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@ArishMell The fact that you are "all still alive" says nothing for the safety of a vaccine! Fortunately, they don't kill everyone! yet the covid mRNA injections are very very far from being safe and they are anything but effective.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@WalterF Why are you so against public health?
WalterF · 70-79, M
@ArishMell I don't understand this question.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@ArishMell (re the WHO) Do not ask me why until you yourself are in possession of the real facts about this failing organisation and its communist power-hungry leader.

Once you are, you will no longer need to ask me.

I have given you links that any independent truth-seeker would explore. You are clearly unwilling to step outside of what all the major influences on our thinking would have us believe.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@WalterF I know you think the WHO is some sort of power-game run by someone allegedly with Communist leanings, and you can point to all sorts of dubious fellow opinions, but I don't take your allegations seriously.

I have read some of your sources, but I am sceptical about their origins and purposes.

Regarding diseases, frankly I'd far rather take the very small chance of seriously untoward reactions from a vaccine, to the much higher chance of serious or even fatal complications of a strange new disease unless vaccinated against it.

What are you going to do when the next epidemic or pandemic arrives? Not when, if. Especially if it is even worse than Covid; such as Ebola, a new strain of Bubonic Plague, or something new to us humans but endemic in some other animal species maltreated by humans.

Are you going to try to persuade others to refuse to protect themselves from that, too?

Even influenza can kill - but I don't believe you care as long as you survive.

'''''
(The Plague, a.k.a. Black Death, kills most sufferers within a few days unless treated very promptly. Ebola does too, and horribly; and it came from chimpanzees killed for food.)
WalterF · 70-79, M
@ArishMell The existing, well-thought-out plan to deal with pandemics that the British authorities had developed over several years, was excellent. Protect the vulnerable, but let society continue to function, so that immunity will develop. Trust individuals to react sensibly; if they get ill, they self-isolate. They are not fools. They do not need to be nannied or FORCED.

This sound plan was for some reason ABANDONED on the arrival of covid flu - yet another coronavirus from those that regularly circulate amongst us.

The resulting, concerted action by the majority of governments was destructive to our society. It was terribly flawed. The WHO pushed it, hard. Willingly assisted by the subservient media, and the government "nudge"units, to work on drumming up compliance through fear (democratic, that? when you force people for example to stay indoors 23 hours out of 24, as in a prison lockdown situation?) Big Pharma made billions out of it, and continues to do so.

My concern is to open people's eyes to the behind-the-scenes. Whether they rush to take new injections or not is their affair. If they want to take the risk that the spike proteins their body will henceforth create reach their brain or their heart, that’s their decision. If they want to trust the needle-holders and rush to receive potions that will modify their DNA, that is up to them.

So long as people reply "I don’t trust the source", they are beyond help.

Too bad.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@WalterF Tjis disease was new to humans, was spreading very rapidly, has a peculiar range of effects no-one could have predicted, and when not killing people it was putting thousands of others into hospital where most needed artificial aids to breathe.

Yes, some sort of natural immunity would have developed and may in time; but if left to Nature as you want, probably taking many years and millions of cases, many fatal, overloading everyone's national health services, to do so.

Would you rather they were sacrificed because the drastic action we did take, however rightly or wrongly, is against your political views?

Is that what you would have advised the government or the WHO, if you were a top-flight epidemiologist?

'
"Subservient" media? To whom? Or do you mean daring to reflect views with which you disagree?
WalterF · 70-79, M
@ArishMell The media: "Daring to" foist upon the ordinary man a very VERY carefully and fully constructed unified thought system, cancelling ALL learned opposing voices, and forcing the sufficiently frightened population to submit to an untried untested novel form of treatment that has caused and continues to cause untold harm.

ALL THIS FOR A DISEASE THAT KILLED LESS THAN 0.05% OF PEOPLE.

For that, I will forever ignore these treacherous media. I will never forgive the "experts"who advised, the governments who complied, and the pharma companies who started the ball rolling and earned fortunes for every second of the débâcle.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@ArishMell

Trust The Science! Safe and effective, they parroted!
(the risk is entirely yours. Ironically, Big Pharma has full immunity.)

5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) received through 28-FEB-2021
by Worldwide Safety Pfizer

Publication date 2021-04-30
Usage Public Domain Mark 1.0Creative Commons Licensepublicdomain
Topics Adverse Event, Pfizer
Collection opensource
Language English
5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) received through 28-FEB-2021


AUTHOR: Worldwide Safety Pfizer

STAMPED: 090177e196ea1800\Approved\Approved On: 30-Apr-2021 09:26 (GMT)
REF: FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0000054

By February of 2021, Pfizer had already received more than 1,200 reports of death allegedly caused by the vaccine and tens of thousands of reported adverse events, including 23 cases of spontaneous abortions out of 270 pregnancies and more than 2,000 reports of cardiac disorders.)

Pages: 38 | Filesize: 983 KB
Download PDF Copy: https://t.me/FOURCMVAULT/206
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@WalterF I know the safety one particular vaccine that might not have been used in the UK has become doubtful, but you are fully anti-vaccination and anti-science; so what is your constructive, realistic and humane alternative?
WalterF · 70-79, M
@ArishMell

1. Human intelligence, including:

(a) the ability to perceive:
- that men are not naturally well-disposed to their fellows
- that this applies particularly to men once they get authority over others
- the true, indisputable fact, proved endlessly in every civilisation since the dawn of time, that the three magnetic forces which are sex, riches and power, can derail the best-intentioned of men, and especially those who have ditched Christian moral standards in their pursuit of self-aggandisement, and

(b) the perspicacity to stand back, analyse, and see through a concerted effort by all influencers to make people believe a theory from which many stand to benefit ' - except the little man. Example: videos (since removed) of Chinese citizens falling over in the street, shown on all news channels; "Nightingale" hospitals with thousands of beds (later dismantled without having received a single patient); nurses dancing in Tiktok videos, in EMPTY WARDS)... The intelligent individual might question these and many other broadcast "proofs" of a "pandemic" which was, incidentally DOWNGRADED as a threat one week before the imprisonment of the people - in itself, a total non-solution in the face of a flu virus.

2. Reliance on natural immunity, coupled with great wariness about taking money-spinning remedies that diminish that immunity (as my masters students happily inform me, there is no medicine that does not have side effects). This coupled with a healthy diet and lifestyle - something which the pharmaceutical industry distinctly does NOT push, as there is no money in it.

Do that, friend, and you have a sporting chance. If a disease cartches you, well, we all have to die somehow. But don't latch on to the foolish mission, propounded by the WHO et al, to conquer all disease via medicine and social control. A fool's errand, which will enrich them, and ruin us.
SW-User
[image/video deleted]

Imagine living through the last 4 years and still not being the slightest bit suspicious…
SW-User
[media=https://instagram.com/C2W-wXkR_5v]

Excess deaths= GENOCIDE
WalterF · 70-79, M
@SW-User Andrew Bridgen - one of the very few honest and discerning politicians we have
SW-User
@WalterF

💯 we need more like him.