Upset
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Oh dear! Can you explain this, Dr Fauci?

[b]Didn't you say that the vaccine was safe and effective?
Oh, you don't remember having said that?
Well, your obedient servants in the mainstream media hammered that message home 24/7/365.
And now look where we are! [/b]

[i](Beginning of an article in the mainstream media The Daily Mail, allergic to all "conspiracy theories" - and allergic to any form of dot-joining)[/i]

This post is closed and no longer available for commenting.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
PSuss1 · 51-55, M
People are still getting Covid. What's your point?

...and the DM is a right wing comic, gutter press that thrives on sensationalising non-stories for the hard of thinking, nothing more 🤷‍♂️
@PSuss1 love that definition of the DM
WalterF · 70-79, M
@PSuss1 Getting it, despite filling their bodies full of untested fluid that was supposed to STOP THEM GETTING IT?

That is a very strong point indeed, which you would do well to consider
WalterF · 70-79, M
@InOtterWords The definition really is special. You will never use it when said DM spews the usual propaganda, I'm sure.But when it presents info that questions the narrrative, then you have no time for it.

DM aside, you're in trouble here. Use a litle common sense
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
DavidS56 · 61-69, M
@WalterF You don't understand vaccinations if you think they are designed to stop you catching something.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@PSuss1 The NMJ publishes what it is told (and paid handsomely) to publish.

All in the interests of The Science, aka Settled Science.

Good luck to you, anyway.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@DavidS56 What I don't understand is that they dared to foist on the world population a "vaccine" cobbled together in a couple of months, as opposed to the usual 10-year timespan.

And as for their constant drum-beating that it is safe for pregnant women and women of child-bearing age? WHERE IS THE PROOF?

And safe for children? This is criminal.

And safe for older people already taking strong meds for different existing conditions? Scandalous. Zero trials!

No words are strong enough to describe the wickedness and the deceit of the big players here, who earned millions by the day.

And you think it's all ok?

Good luck to you.
DavidS56 · 61-69, M
@WalterF I'm not even going to bother.

All I can say is that I hope you are a comedian, because you are just hilarious.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@DavidS56 Sorry - you're "not even going to bother?" Really??

Let me reply to that with one of the terms I learned from other fact-checker dependents / zealots like you:

No answers? "YOU'VE GOT NOTHING"

Game over.

I wish you well.
DavidS56 · 61-69, M
@WalterF No i'm not going to bother responding to your nonsense because there's no point with someone so ignorant.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@DavidS56 If you define "ignorant" as having no knowledge outside of the brainwashing that media fans and Fauci fanatics willingly take in, then that rather refers to you, surely.

You seem to think that the tens of thousands of scientists the world over, who have been investigating deaths following closely on vaccinations, doing autopsies, discovering grotesque giant blood clots of types never before seen, analysing wht is in these injections - you seem to think they publish their works as childish cartoons or hand-help camera youtube videos!

Wake up, man!
DavidS56 · 61-69, M
@WalterF Yes, you are very ignorant, in the usual sense of the word.
This post is closed and no longer available for commenting.