Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Is it wrong for white guys to date Asian women? This interracial pairing makes the dating life of asian males hard.

If you're an asian guy, your girls are being stolen by the white race in western countries. Like, the stats in this video are bad. I honestly feel bad for asian guys given how hard the dating market is. I think the pairing of white guys with asian girls is not bad in itself, but it's having consequences that dis-privileges a minority group. Is it not?

[media=https://youtu.be/5r0274n55xo]


As a white boy, I totally understand the appeal of asian women. IF you're white, you have to accept that most white women do not care about sexua purity, marriage, or anything like that, so you are tempted to go to latinas or asians. That said, it just ain't fair to the eastern dudes of the world
Librarose · 18-21, F
Asian girls aren't property of asian men to be 'stolen'.
@Librarose It's a figure of speech...
Let's ignore your redundant tier and incel talking points.

Nothing wrong with interracial relationships but a discussion must be had by both people about cultural expectations and compromises must be made.

The discussions should be long and concise.
SW-User
Tough noodles!
Penny · 46-50, F
Theres plenty of caucasian women who go for asian guys.
WintaTheAngle · 41-45, M
Not at all.
ViciDraco · 36-40, M
It's pretty twisted if a dude is looking to date asian or Latina women based on sexual purity.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
ViciDraco · 36-40, M
@BRUUH

1) You are going to need to define what justice means in this context. My objective is human happiness as well as freedom to make personal decisions.
2,3) it has not been demonstrated that monogamous upbringing is better for children than other forms of upbringing. The only real poly arrangements that have been studied are those arising out of damaging religious views. There is insufficient data for comparison on this point.
4) correlation is not causation. You are making these arguments from anecdote.
5,6,7) More pure conjecture based on the personal argument being made. You seek to restrict autonomy and personal choice to protect a hypothetical pure relationship. That's too much control over people's lives for me. That level of control violates my personal decision value and reduces happiness for a great many people in order to protect the happiness of some other people.
@ViciDraco It's funny cause I don't even know what the numbering of point's wer're using are lmfao. I kinda intended for them to be premises but whatevs.

I define justice the same way that Plato and Socrates both agreed on it's definition in "Plato's republic". This definition of justice is "getting what you deserve". The reason why I say justice AND wellbeing are crucial to what makes something good or moral, is because pure utilitarianism, which is only concerned with overall happiness, does not account for who's happiness should be prioritized. For example: Would I rather make 50 serial killers happy, or 10 children with cancer happy? Most poeple, i'd imagine, would say the 10 children, even tho this means they are choosing less overall happiness for humanity; the reason for this descision is people's sense of justice. That's what I mean.

2,3?)Isn't this a "No true scottsman fallacy"? You're saying that any study on poly relationships don't count because society at large is monogamous. You're basically suggesting that until most of society is fully poly, we can't study it what so ever. If anything, this would just mean we should never be poly, because we would be changing into something radically different that we can't study. Luckily we can study it, and the studies show what kids grow up to be the best. Having a father and mother in the home is literally the best arrangement, like even biology itself gives the father and mother neurochemical motivation. The books "The male brain" and "The female brain" by Louann Brizendine (PHD in neuroscience) goes into detail about what happens in the brain of a mother and father when they have their children. It's obviously that generally speaking, both those parents should be in that childs life consistently, and it's also apparent that if those two parents are fucking other ppl and having weekend orgies, it's counter-productice (to say the least; personally i'd say wicked and degenerate, but i'm trying to be objective here).

4)I acknowledge i'm making correlative arguments; I don't grant that i'm making anecdotal arguments. I haven't used a single anecdote that I can think of. And yeah, these aren't like causal factors. It's not like someone marries a woman with a high body count, then divorces her for that. More that sex is a bonding ritual, and obviously doing it only with a single person is going to make that person more significant in your life. Virgins have the highest rates of staying together. Apparently, even couples who lived together prior to marriage have a higher rate of divorce than couples who didn't. The old way is the good way on marriage. Literally, if left wingers were just pro-family and anti-degeneracy, I would possibly be one.
5,6,7)I don't think what I said here was conjecture? I said if peopel are promiscuous, then younger people who would later go onto wanting monogamy and family will also be getting fucked, thus the same arguments apply; promiscious culture in the USA will contribute to the breakup of the family, which is the best arrangement for children. That's not conjecture? Like, this happens everyday; motherfuckers change their mind and take dick.. not conjecture at all.
Hanginginthere · 31-35, M
people should date who they want. stop worrying about what other people think.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment