Top | Newest First | Oldest First
zerofuks2give · 41-45, M
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
Rolexeo · 26-30, M
Please, America is one of the very few places in the world where you can be LGBT or have an abortion.
View 7 more replies »
Rolexeo · 26-30, M
@AngelofFail They flip-flopped on masks, the vaccine does little to nothing to mitigate the effects of an extremely weak disease which many need to get tested for to even know they have because they're asymptomatic, there have been doctors that spoke out but they've largely been censored, the vaccine has caused blood clots, deaths, etc so had to be recalled. Oh yeah, they really know what they're doing. The flu is more deadly for some age groups, that isn't a contentious statement, the CDC admits to this. You're uneducated on the subject. You literally just make shit up as you go, prove there's long-term effects.
That doesn't mean it's about consensus. Holy shit, it's like you think scientists are infalliable. Science and scientists are not one in the same.
I highly reccomend you do. It could feel no pain, it'd still be unethical.
That doesn't mean it's about consensus. Holy shit, it's like you think scientists are infalliable. Science and scientists are not one in the same.
I highly reccomend you do. It could feel no pain, it'd still be unethical.
AngelofFail · 26-30, F
@Rolexeo i highly recommend you rad up on the statistics of fatal developments comparing the disease and the vaxxine, as you seem to have no idea what you are talking about.
well.. science is based on knowledge being true until its been challenged with a better model. it desires to be challenged and to switch to a better version of a model. but until you can come up with a better model its treated as the truth, especially with established 150 year old science that has been challenged for decades and has proven over and over to be true against all kind of nutjobs. you might have a point on areas of science where we have to admit a "we dont know" but this isnt one of those areas.
so taking control over your own body from someone is an ethical act ?
well.. science is based on knowledge being true until its been challenged with a better model. it desires to be challenged and to switch to a better version of a model. but until you can come up with a better model its treated as the truth, especially with established 150 year old science that has been challenged for decades and has proven over and over to be true against all kind of nutjobs. you might have a point on areas of science where we have to admit a "we dont know" but this isnt one of those areas.
so taking control over your own body from someone is an ethical act ?
Rolexeo · 26-30, M
@AngelofFail "rad up"? "vaxxine"? But you want to get on your high horse and call other people uneducated, good lord 🙄 Stop embarrassing yourself
Science doesn't prove things, you realize that, right? We never "know". No, something is treated as true so long as the consensus thinks so, even if better evidence is brought to the table.
Ah, so now it's not just a clump of cells? I knew you didn't really believe it was.
Science doesn't prove things, you realize that, right? We never "know". No, something is treated as true so long as the consensus thinks so, even if better evidence is brought to the table.
Ah, so now it's not just a clump of cells? I knew you didn't really believe it was.
I get what you're saying -- the difference is white collar crime
mindless · M
the flow of financial backing
Virgo79 · 61-69, M
Theres a lot of confusion these days
Lostpoet · M
Money