@Rolexeo thats why it doesnt say america and afghanistan.. but gop and taliban... if both "parties" are trying to steer their respective country in the same direction. while one faces a lot more opposition then the other.
@AngelofFail You're being hyperbolic about the GOP. Also a lot of these aren't even bad, some you're just lying about. Anti-LGBTQ, no they're not. Anti-science, the fuck are you talking about? Anti-women's rights, how? Yes, they're anti-killing babies. What's exactly wrong with one dominating religion? Pro-gun, your point?
@Rolexeo well the last gop president openly was speaking out agaisnt science in regard how to deal with a pandemic or global warming. also many gop prominent people oppose vaxxinations and new technologies like gene therapies and there is a ton of nutters in the gop that view 5G as something evil.
one dominating religion in a country that was explicitely founded to not have any religion dominating is actually worse.
and yeah anti choice in case of womans health is as bad as it gets really.
Your non-FDA approved vaccine that we don't know the long-term effects of, has a 99+% recovery rate that almost exclisively kills the elderly and people with pre-existing health conditions? On top of that many had to be recalled due to the extreme adverse effects and you're not allowed to sue them. Vaccines are supposed to be tested for 5-10 years before use, not 9 months. Yeah, I wonder why people don't want to take this experimental vaccine. The scientists botched this from the get-go by flip-flopping on their word so much.
As for global warming, the predictions are never correct so why should anyone believe it?
We borrow a lot from Christianity. Regardless, are things not permitted to change? I'm not a Christian but you expect people to not try to enforce their values?
@AngelofFail Ok, don't say you're pro-science when you support rolling out vaccines after 9 months then, you're anti-science. The disease is innocous, for some age groups the flu is more deadly. Ok, so you can say the disease has long-term effects (without proof) but people can't be concerned that the rushed vaccine that had recalls could? Why should I trust them when there's already been adverse effects such as blood-clots, death, etc, and you can't sue them for it. They kept flip-flopping on masks too. So either they're incompetent or liars.
Yeah, because they get fired. Say it with me, consensus is not science.
It has a beating heart and resembles a baby and feels pain. You can try to dehumanize it as much as you want to feel less guilty but you're lying to yourself
@Rolexeo your complete lack of understanding how covid affects the human body when you compare it to a normal flu shows that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. but for some weird reason you seem to still know better then thousands of doctors that have been studying viruses and diseases for decades. sure you can have an opinion on it but that opinion is absolutely worthless.
and yes science is about consens and defending a theory vs new and better theories. so yeah as long as noone comes up with any valid theory to challenge the current model that one model is the consens. it has proven itself and when someone can proof it invalid it will be replaced with a better model, but there is noone challenging the current model.
and i highly recommend you update your knowledge on the development of a human baby in the uterus as to when it feels pain and the brain functions.
@AngelofFail They flip-flopped on masks, the vaccine does little to nothing to mitigate the effects of an extremely weak disease which many need to get tested for to even know they have because they're asymptomatic, there have been doctors that spoke out but they've largely been censored, the vaccine has caused blood clots, deaths, etc so had to be recalled. Oh yeah, they really know what they're doing. The flu is more deadly for some age groups, that isn't a contentious statement, the CDC admits to this. You're uneducated on the subject. You literally just make shit up as you go, prove there's long-term effects.
That doesn't mean it's about consensus. Holy shit, it's like you think scientists are infalliable. Science and scientists are not one in the same.
I highly reccomend you do. It could feel no pain, it'd still be unethical.
@Rolexeo i highly recommend you rad up on the statistics of fatal developments comparing the disease and the vaxxine, as you seem to have no idea what you are talking about.
well.. science is based on knowledge being true until its been challenged with a better model. it desires to be challenged and to switch to a better version of a model. but until you can come up with a better model its treated as the truth, especially with established 150 year old science that has been challenged for decades and has proven over and over to be true against all kind of nutjobs. you might have a point on areas of science where we have to admit a "we dont know" but this isnt one of those areas.
so taking control over your own body from someone is an ethical act ?
@AngelofFail "rad up"? "vaxxine"? But you want to get on your high horse and call other people uneducated, good lord 🙄 Stop embarrassing yourself
Science doesn't prove things, you realize that, right? We never "know". No, something is treated as true so long as the consensus thinks so, even if better evidence is brought to the table.
Ah, so now it's not just a clump of cells? I knew you didn't really believe it was.
