Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Am A Real Werewolf

Werewolves and lycanthropes are the same thing. There is no difference between the two, no special genome that one has that the other does not, nor are werewolves fated to only shift during the full moon, or lack control of their shifts.

Why would there even be a separation between the two resulting in two specific categories? Lycanthrope is just a different name for werewolf, the same way ailuranthrope is a different name for werecat, and therianthrope (the historical version of the word, not what it's been redefined as) is just a different name for shapeshifter. Yet, I only see this weird "lycan vs were" distinction with wolves. Plus, the moon doesn't control anyone's shifts, really. You could psychologically have an inclination to shift around that time, and may feel pumped for it, but it's not going to force you to shift. And control is built with practice of shifting, so this isn't something unique to "lycans", nor are the forms that werewolves take unique to them alone.

Nor do a majority of the breeds I see popping up nowadays actual breeds. There is no loup-garou (there is in mythology, but the one I'm talking about has been cited as having five forms specifically, and in reality originates from a certain role-playing game), there is no jaeger, there are no bloodchasers, there are none of these new breeds that I'm seeing pop up. Real breeds can be found with something as simple as a Google search (it's not that easy to find the correct information, granted, but you can find the breed name at least by simply searching up "werewolves" and going from there) and don't have all these "mystical" elements and link to fiction in the way that the breeds I'm seeing tend to.

I'm going to leave off with this note, otherkin and werewolves are not the same. Maybe they once were able to be grouped under the same umbrella, but they're not the same now, and they don't fit under the classifications. An otherkin is anyone who identifies in a non-physical manner as a non-human being- this has been the definition for several years now, so besides confusing others, you send the wrong message for both communities when you claim to be otherkin but also a real werewolf. They're not the same, and grouping them together publicly tends to hurt everyone, rather than help, especially since both communities have very different wants and needs.

This is all I had to say, thank you for your time and reading this.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
I hunt your kind..
Drachona · 31-35, M
@SW-User Good for you. I'm assuming you're joking and not admitting to the murders of individuals who are legally considered people. That might not be so wise.
SW-User
@Drachona I am joking...unless you're a real werewolf....in which case, murder doesn't apply to a non human being, changeling or otherwise.
Drachona · 31-35, M
@SW-User Actually, if one is considered a citizen of a country, then they are allowed the rights of that citizenry. Werewolves are defined as people with the ability to transform into a wolf or wolf-like creature. We, therefore, have personhood. Since both the word murder and the word homicide are defined as a crime committed against a person, the killing of werewolves who live within human society is, by definition, murder.
SW-User
One Law in a country that says hunting werewolves is illegal then I'll stop hunting your kind😂
Drachona · 31-35, M
@SW-User It doesn't matter. If werewolves can be legally defined as people and as citizens, which they can, then a hunter would be killing people. That is illegal.
SW-User
@Drachona Soooo......Do you go to the Vet or the Doctor when sick?
Drachona · 31-35, M
@SW-User Depends on how much they charge.
SW-User
@Drachona Are you cousins in the Anti Alaskan Mushers Movement?
Drachona · 31-35, M
@SW-User It's not like using other animals to their advantage is new for humans. It's been fairly popular for the past 10,000 years or so. As long as the mushers are treating their dogs right, I don't really have a problem with it.
SW-User
What about cats, have an issue with them?
Drachona · 31-35, M
@SW-User I like cats and dogs. When you're a busy person, cats are nice because they often do their own thing, but dogs are fun to play-fight with.
SW-User
@Drachona Do you play fetch? Also what can you tell me about Van Helsing?
Drachona · 31-35, M
@SW-User I play catch, not fetch. Although, I've had friends make that joke; taking some object, throwing it, and saying "fetch". As for Van Helsing, do you mean the character or the film? I, personally, like the film. I think Stephen Sommers makes enjoyable adventure films.
SW-User
Where did you get..."born" at ?
Drachona · 31-35, M
@SW-User Say what? Why did you put "born" in quotation marks? Personally, I got Bourne at the video store.
SheAngel19 · 36-40, F
@Drachona stop feeding the trolls
Drachona · 31-35, M
@SheAngel19 If you look at the majority of the conversation, I took it as a joke. This person may be a troll, but at least they're playing along instead of just throwing out insults.
SheAngel19 · 36-40, F
I know but it just inclines them to stay.
Drachona · 31-35, M
@SheAngel19 They left.
@SW-User Well that's racist...