@
TheWolfEmperor Firstly, I said nothing about "belief". Whether or not you believe in werewolves is up to you and, ultimately, irrelevant to this conversation. Personal beliefs do not define reality. Also, nothing about your statement disproves what I said. Being dismissive of something simply because you do not have evidence, which likely you haven't looked for (hard to find what you aren't looking for), is both ignorant and arrogant. It does not negate the unquestionable fact that treating current scientific knowledge as complete and infallible is both dangerous and inherently unscientific. You do not
know that werewolves do not exist and, because of a paradox of evidence, you cannot
prove that werewolves do not exist. This does not automatically mean that they do, but the possibility is unquestionable and, if you actually looked for evidence, I can guarantee you would find it. You may not find the smoking gun of unquestionable proof, but you cannot ignore historical records, prehistoric iconography, a large collection of stories, or countless sightings simply because you do not, personally, "believe" in werewolves. The fact that you mention transforming under the full moon proves that you are operating from a position of ignorance. How could you possibly make any weighted statements about werewolves when you can't even distinguish what it relevant to the subject?