gregloa · 61-69, M
Evolution did happen, with Gods help. Recently scientists have discovered after taking into account the alignment that was previously ignored because of technological difficulties we share about 80% dna with chimps. We also share 60% dna with bananas. Fact is all living organisms share dna. Of course chimps being most like humans we would share more dna. That certainly doesn’t make chimps our relatives. We share from a common ancestor but not a recent one.
View 7 more replies »
@gregloa
lol imagine my utter shock that you did not take gracefully being told that you were wrong 😏
I even went to the trouble of explaining exactly what was wrong with the statistic you were quoting, how it was misrepresented and why it's not new.... and do you address any of the information? Ask any clarifying questions?
No: You start ranting about atheists 🤣😂
And it's myopic bordering on idiotic to automatically equate science which contradicts creationist talking points with atheism.
It's just science, lil bro. If creationism doesn't stand up to scientific scrutiny then that is a failing of creationist ideology, not science. Am I right? I'm right!
Look, it's ok to be wrong, bud. Happens to the best of us. And if you don't think you're wrong, go away and do some more research and get back to me.
The emotional outburst isn't helping your case or your credibility. Do better.
lol imagine my utter shock that you did not take gracefully being told that you were wrong 😏
I even went to the trouble of explaining exactly what was wrong with the statistic you were quoting, how it was misrepresented and why it's not new.... and do you address any of the information? Ask any clarifying questions?
No: You start ranting about atheists 🤣😂
And it's myopic bordering on idiotic to automatically equate science which contradicts creationist talking points with atheism.
It's just science, lil bro. If creationism doesn't stand up to scientific scrutiny then that is a failing of creationist ideology, not science. Am I right? I'm right!
Look, it's ok to be wrong, bud. Happens to the best of us. And if you don't think you're wrong, go away and do some more research and get back to me.
The emotional outburst isn't helping your case or your credibility. Do better.
gregloa · 61-69, M
@Pikachu
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
Couldn’t have said it better myself, about you. Lil bro! Bud! It’s ok to admit you’re wrong! Wow talk about proving my point! Shock! Misrepresenting! Not take to gracefully being told that you are wrong! Troubling myself by explaining exactly what is wrong! Do you ask clarifying questions, no you start ranting about creationists. On and on and on. Atheistic ideologies have been proven wrong time and again and even found to have been erased from their own data when they realized their own mistakes, not about to admit they were wrong and correct their data, but intentionally hide the truth and dismiss the facts when being called out for their obvious errors, even though it would not change the opinions of others, just the fact that being wrong and changing their own data would be so incomprehensible to their unchangeable minds, rather than be satisfied by the actual truth as any sane person would be. You want to talk about bordering on idiotic to automatically equate science which contradicts atheistic talking points with creationism. It’s just science lil bro. Have a little faith will ya. If atheism doesn’t stand up to scientific scrutiny then that is a failing of atheist ideology. Not science. Am I right? I’m right! Obviously it’s not okay for you to be wrong, bud. Do some research of your own not with a closed mind. It’s not helping your case or your credibility!
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
Couldn’t have said it better myself, about you. Lil bro! Bud! It’s ok to admit you’re wrong! Wow talk about proving my point! Shock! Misrepresenting! Not take to gracefully being told that you are wrong! Troubling myself by explaining exactly what is wrong! Do you ask clarifying questions, no you start ranting about creationists. On and on and on. Atheistic ideologies have been proven wrong time and again and even found to have been erased from their own data when they realized their own mistakes, not about to admit they were wrong and correct their data, but intentionally hide the truth and dismiss the facts when being called out for their obvious errors, even though it would not change the opinions of others, just the fact that being wrong and changing their own data would be so incomprehensible to their unchangeable minds, rather than be satisfied by the actual truth as any sane person would be. You want to talk about bordering on idiotic to automatically equate science which contradicts atheistic talking points with creationism. It’s just science lil bro. Have a little faith will ya. If atheism doesn’t stand up to scientific scrutiny then that is a failing of atheist ideology. Not science. Am I right? I’m right! Obviously it’s not okay for you to be wrong, bud. Do some research of your own not with a closed mind. It’s not helping your case or your credibility!
@gregloa
Yeah...when the first sentence is essentially "I know you are but what am iiii ?! " then i'm not gonna bother to read the rest.
You're allowing your ego and dogmatism to make a fool of you.
Please feel free to identify any points in particular that you feel i was mistaken on.
I will address those. Your emotional crashouts, however hold little interest to me.
Better luck next time, lil guy😘
Yeah...when the first sentence is essentially "I know you are but what am iiii ?! " then i'm not gonna bother to read the rest.
You're allowing your ego and dogmatism to make a fool of you.
Please feel free to identify any points in particular that you feel i was mistaken on.
I will address those. Your emotional crashouts, however hold little interest to me.
Better luck next time, lil guy😘
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
@jshm2
lol aww so cute 🤩
10/10 enthusiasm but 1/10 familiarity with the science. It's a rookie mistake and ya hate to see it...
The argument goes that humans share 50% of our genes with bananas, not DNA as a whole. Genes are the part of the DNA that code for proteins but that only accounts for a few percent of the actual genome...so we share a bunch of genes with bananas but not much of our genetic code.
Keeping up? Doubt it.
Essentially there are about 50% of or genes coding for proteins for which we can find analogues in a banana plant but share very little of our overall genome with them.
By contrast, humans and chimpanzees share about 98% of our entire genome.
So....
1) you failed to understand the science
2) you failed to address the question
3).....you keep saying "sunny" as in a sunny day....are you trying to say "sonny" as in sonny boy?😆
tl;dr womp womp
lol aww so cute 🤩
10/10 enthusiasm but 1/10 familiarity with the science. It's a rookie mistake and ya hate to see it...
The argument goes that humans share 50% of our genes with bananas, not DNA as a whole. Genes are the part of the DNA that code for proteins but that only accounts for a few percent of the actual genome...so we share a bunch of genes with bananas but not much of our genetic code.
Keeping up? Doubt it.
Essentially there are about 50% of or genes coding for proteins for which we can find analogues in a banana plant but share very little of our overall genome with them.
By contrast, humans and chimpanzees share about 98% of our entire genome.
So....
1) you failed to understand the science
2) you failed to address the question
3).....you keep saying "sunny" as in a sunny day....are you trying to say "sonny" as in sonny boy?😆
tl;dr womp womp





