Objections to Evolution

@BlueSkyKing Oh, I definitely think it has it's place in religion and spirituality. And I know of biologists who don't believe in evolution. Creationism doesn't need to teach subjects like those. Evolution can't teach auto mechanics or wood shop. Eugenics, yes, but, not home economics.

@BibleData Eugenics? Umm... sorry, wrong century. In fact, wrong millennium 😀

@BibleData You seem to think there’s some sort of equivalence of evolution and creationism, but they’re two completely separate topics.

@newjaninev2 [quote]Eugenics? Umm... sorry, wrong century. In fact, wrong millennium 😀[/quote]

There's this guy - Bill Gates. Distant relative and great admirer of John D. Rockefeller. Son of Dr. Bill Livingston aka William Rockefeller or "Devil Bill" as the locals called him. Snake Oil.

Oh, yeah. We struck conspiracy right 'cheer.

They don't call it eugenics anymore. Not since the Nazis I think, but yeah. It definitely had its origins in Eugenics.

@BibleData I have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about... but I see what you’re trying to [i]not[/i] talk about.

@newjaninev2 Good. I'm trying not to talk about the details of evolution. From the start.

@BibleData and what objections to evolution have you discovered?

@BibleData [quote]Oh, I definitely think it has its place in religion and spirituality. And I know of biologists who don't believe in evolution.[/quote]
Anecdotal. Creationism doesn’t have models designed to test theories because there are no theories. If you want truth, test. Truth demands to be tested.

@newjaninev2 I have no objections to it.

@BlueSkyKing So you can test evolution, as in a common ancestor? Your objection is - uh, wait a minute - you've got the wrong thread. You seem to be objecting to creationism. You don't have any objections to evolution?

Anyone notice a trend here? Dogma and indoctrination seems to be the trend.

@BibleData Nothing easier than testing common ancestry.

DNA is such a wonderful tool! 😀

@newjaninev2 I think Dr. David Martin's take on DNA was interesting. A useful tool for life insurance companies and mortgages. But testing? Really? You mean like a water witch?

@BibleData Umm.. do you know what DNA is, how it works, and what it can be used for?

I’d be very happy to cover that for you, if you’d like, but somehow I don’t think that’s something you’d like.

@newjaninev2 Why would I like that . . . . . . in this thread about objection to evolution . . . .

@BibleData Bit of a failure, really, given that no objections have been lodged...

@newjaninev2 Haven't they?

@BibleData No, they haven’t.

I just now said that

@newjaninev2 Are you suggesting that in a thread with the specific subject title and explanation that it is about [b]objection[/b] that has 114 replies as of this posting, not one objection has been lodged?

Why do you think that is?

The alternate thread with the exact same title and explanation - evolution crossed out and creationism written in it's place - there are, as of this posting, 6 replies and some objection. So, in a forum on creationism in a section devoted to religion and spirituality the thread on evolution is without objections but 114 replies and the creationism objection thread in the evolution forum has 6.

Can your scientific mind come up with an explanation?

My favorite part is when one of the evolutionists complained about evolution being in the religion and spirituality forums! Even lodged a complaint to management. In either this or another thread. It's like the priest calling the church black.

Either y'all are more religious than the religious or you don't follow directions well.