That evolution has occurred is inescapable yet some creationists think that finding a living dinosaur would disprove evolution...well How?
For example, many people have searched for Mokele-mbembe; the supposed sauropod dinosaur living in the Congo. But supposing someone [i]did[/i] finally find Mokele-mbembe how would it somehow overturn the theory of evolution and an old earth?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
It’s the time line they have a problem with. Dinosaurs went extinct millions of years ago. If they found one living with humans. They can deny all history before the bible
@DocSavage [quote]t’s the time line they have a problem with. Dinosaurs went extinct millions of years ago. If they found one living with humans. They can deny all history before the bible[/quote]
Explain the logic underlying that conclusion, please?
@Pikachu Book of Genesis has all animals and humans created in a week, Ken Ham has children playing with pet raptors in his museum. If dinosaurs lived with humans it supports his six thousand year biblical timeline. YECs still have a problem with that.
Ok i think i get it...although i think he'd have a lot more hurdles to get over before he could say that if humans and some dinosaurs co-existed then the earth is 6000 years old lol
@Pikachu Ken Ham also to acknowledge light years, because star light also disproves the time line. That’s why Godspeed63 still owes me the definition of them.
