That evolution has occurred is inescapable yet some creationists think that finding a living dinosaur would disprove evolution...well How?
For example, many people have searched for Mokele-mbembe; the supposed sauropod dinosaur living in the Congo. But supposing someone did finally find Mokele-mbembe how would it somehow overturn the theory of evolution and an old earth?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
It’s the time line they have a problem with. Dinosaurs went extinct millions of years ago. If they found one living with humans. They can deny all history before the bible
t’s the time line they have a problem with. Dinosaurs went extinct millions of years ago. If they found one living with humans. They can deny all history before the bible
Explain the logic underlying that conclusion, please?
@Pikachu Book of Genesis has all animals and humans created in a week, Ken Ham has children playing with pet raptors in his museum. If dinosaurs lived with humans it supports his six thousand year biblical timeline. YECs still have a problem with that.
Ok i think i get it...although i think he'd have a lot more hurdles to get over before he could say that if humans and some dinosaurs co-existed then the earth is 6000 years old lol
@Pikachu Ken Ham also to acknowledge light years, because star light also disproves the time line. That’s why Godspeed63 still owes me the definition of them.
