When Trump provided encouragement to our adversaries; telling them to attack America cities. That’s treason right?

Treason defined as
According to Article III, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution, treason against the United States includes only two actions:
• Levying war against the United States.
• Adhering to enemies, giving them aid and comfort.

Seems to Me DJT wants a to be convicted. Also he must be distracting from something . . . The Epstein files obviously.

Top | New | Old

AthrillatheHunt · 56-60, M

What Orange said was downright disgusting and anti American.

Roundandroundwego · 61-69

It's a typical conservative view. Grow up and smell the empire.

SumKindaMunster · 56-60, M

Your TBI likely makes it difficult to understand sarcasm and dark humor.

Not defending the "joke", it was in poor taste.

But you don't understand.

View 17 more replies »

SumKindaMunster · 56-60, M

@jehova It's a matter of opinion. It was obvious to me he wasn't serious. You felt otherwise.

In addition, my opinion was that the moment is irrelevant, all that matters is that you "get Trump".

This is just your latest obsession on how to accomplish that.

Anything else?

jehova · 36-40, M

@SumKindaMunster I think we r done using quotes makes things even less “clear” BTW

SumKindaMunster · 56-60, M

@jehova Fair enough. I'm sorry if you didn't get my points, but I believe I stated them simply and clearly.

whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M

Its only treason when someone non MAGA does it. Like keeping bathrooms full of classified documents..😷

sstronaut

I don't think it's treason, as much as just pure stupidity...

jehova · 36-40, M

@sstronaut Id think the two aren’t mutually exclusive. I shot the gun thinking it wouldn’t kill him. I knew it might but I only wanted to scare him isn’t a defense for murder. Especially feigned unawareness would’nt hold up in court

sstronaut

@jehova Agreed, they aren't mutually exclusive, but I don't think an unbiased jury... or let's say an unbiased judge, since an unbiased jury might be hard to find, but I think an unbiased judge wouldn't rule it as treason...

Stupid use of free speak and political speech...

jehova · 36-40, M

@sstronaut definitely I doubt it’d be a jury trial. No one is ever “completely unbiased” seems very treason adjacent

Add a comment...