Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Wales becomes UK's first nation with 20mph default speed limit

A national 20mph limit will come into force in Wales from next year. A vote was held in the Senedd today (July 12) about Welsh Government plans to limit residential roads and busy pedestrian streets to 20mph which passed.

The Welsh Government say it will reduce the risk and severity of injuries as a result of collisions between vehicles and vulnerable road users; encourage more people to cycle and walk; make Wales more attractive for our communities and bring physical and mental health benefits.

There have been pilot schemes running across Wales and Senedd members voted with 39 in favour and 15 against.

In her speech about the plans, climate change minister Julie James said: "The future of our towns and cities depends on our ability to move around sustainably and on solutions that have a positive impact on public health environment and communities.

"That is why we will use the principle that walking cycling and active travel must remain the best options for short urban journeys and a 20mph default speed limit will help achieve this. The introduction of a national 20mph limit would be an important and far reaching policy. If passed Wales would be the first country in the UK to introduce the change. We're asking you all to be part of this change and make our communities understand the wider benefits of 20mph.

Well it has been passed and becomes law in September 2023 maybe the rest of the UK will follow suit so please remember when driving in Wales after September 2023 you will be booked for speeding if your driving over 20 MPH in a 20 MPH zone and lose points on your UK driving licence.

https://chng.it/jQ7MPypkgC
Wow, I'm kinda surprised they are being so straight up with the move to get drivers off the roads!

I'd love to know what mental health benefits they expect to see from forcing people to slow down. All it does is make people more frustrated.
@gol979 I know but keeping the same people in charge will result in no change at all, at least give someone different a chance.

I know, I was being picky, not wanting to give actual adult babies more stick 😋
senghenydd · M
@Tinkles Mines a Kia Picanto as I said with a Turbo, it also has an on-board fuel computer it tells me to the decimal point how much petrol I'm using, I am shocked how much is saved by driving a few MPH slower.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@Tinkles lets give them dummies and a shiny object......plus a narrative that doesnt match up to reality 😉
ArishMell · 70-79, M
There a good many local 20mph limits in England, but largely confined to housing-estates and near schools. Whether a national limit would be wanted or practical is another matter - it might not reduce exhaust and brake-dust pollution if it forces much more low-gear and stop-go driving.

It could also make impatient drivers even worse, compromising the intended safety advantage.

It's all very well encouraging people to cycle or walk but that only works for trips practical or perhaps enjoyable to make in that way. Many live too far from their work or their main shops to be able to leave the car at home, cannot work at home, and might not have suitable bus services as a sensible alternative. Many parents are afraid to let their offspring walk or cycle to school; possibly more so in Winter.

I worked for a company once accessible from home by frequent buses and a moderately short walk - then it was moved to a rural location necessitating a 24-mile round-drive when the bus services to it finally ended as more employees on the same route opted to drive. The railway-station I did need use occasionally, was a three-quarter hour walk away and used by trains having very few cycle spaces.

One big chicken coming home to roost is the 1970s policy of encouraging huge out-of-town shopping areas, and this continues despite the supermarkets' policy always was to encourage only car-bound shoppers who can buy trolley-fulls at a time. (An acquaintance who worked for a supermarket-equipment manufacturer, once told me they originally also designed the shops to deter anyone else, such as the elderly or disabled.)

Will this new speed-limit work as intended? Only time will tell. Other governments may well be watching very closely to see if it does, before making their minds up.
trackboy · 22-25, M
@ArishMell the interstate system was put in in the 1950s so the military could move convoys of trucks at continuous speeds of over 100mph in times of national emergency. the curves of the interstate were laid out with a slip speed of 150 mph. which is the speed at which you would slide off the curves. they allowed traffic to move nationwide from coast to coast and from Mexico to Canada. they had divided highways with a median in the middle so people would not run head-on into each other. you had at least 4 lanes so you were not pulling into the opposing lane to pass a slow car or slow truck. they were limited access where you had to use on and off ramps to get on and off them. no cross traffic allowed. no intersections. you did not have to stop you could keep going non-stop. engines stop working that's why the shoulder. if you could make it to a mile down the road for a pullover normally you can make it to an exit and get off the interstate. or a wheel bearing siezes,. or you run out of gas because your are poor and can't afford gas for your car. at that point, you shoot as many other drivers as you can then you shoot yourself to end the suffering of abject grinding hopeless window staring poverty. Some teenage boys are hyper-dominant and they believe they are dominating others by standing on the road and blocking traffic. they are the boys always getting in fights at school. i sure had my share of fights with them when i was in high school.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@trackboy Interesting - the military reason.

Though I can't imagine any very heavy army lorry laden with supplies really managing much more than 50mph, let alone 100, especially back in the 1950s. Even modern commercial ones won't reach 100. Still, the staff cars might have managed it!

The UK's motorways are somewhat similar in design but were built with commercial, not military, traffic in mind. The first had at least parts with only two lanes per side, but later ones were all built with 3 lanes, and parts of the M25 that encircles the M5 have 4 lanes.

You must not stop on them; the central reservation with barrier stops any U-turns that are illegal anyway. If you make a mistake so head the wrong way along a motorway - though on the correct side for the direction! - , or pass your intended turn-off, you can only continue to the next junction to turn round. That may be quite a long way off, creating a big detour!

Being just about able to drive a mile to the next refuge is not the same as perhaps 10 or 20 miles to the next junction or a service-area! (The latter average about every 30 miles, but the junctions are much more numerous, typically 10 to 20 miles apart.)

++++

If you cannot afford the fuel for the journey, why are you even attempting it anyway?

Your frequent references to shooting people is not only foolish and needless, but also sick.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@trackboy Trust you to wade in with offensive comments suggesting murdering people in what to you is a foreign country you nothing about.

You obviously did not even read Senghenydd's original post properly. He explains who created the regulation, why, and where it applies.

As for God... I am not on PM terms with Him, but I would imagine He intends people to live, not be fatally injured by out-of-control motorists exceeding a statutory speed-limit. Especially in areas where you do not need and often cannot, drive fast anyway.
helenS · 36-40, F
@ArishMell Bravo! 🌷
trackboy · 22-25, M
@ArishMell @ArishMell here just about all roads are faster than that. only the tightest downtown streets with roads coming in and out and buildings right up to the road so you can't see who is coming until the front of your car is out in the street and your nose is up against the windshield as far forward as you can get to see around the building to see if anyone is coming. they need to blow up some buildings so you see if there are any cars coming without the front of your car being out in the street before you can see if there are any cars. it is the pigs that create the rules and the pigs that enforce the rules. you have a government of the pig by the pig for the pig. 🐖
Virgo79 · 61-69, M
@ArishMell sounds like a plan to increase revenue .
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@Virgo79 A lot of people take that cynical view, conveniently forgetting that the extra "revenue" is only from people who break a clear regulation. In other words, people who might accidentally or more especially choose, to make themselves liable to a speeding fine.

We used to have a lot speed-cameras on the roads, until (allegedly), the government, or more likely the Home Office or Treasury, which are a-political, decided to collect the fines but make the county-councils continue to pay for the equipments' upkeep from their local taxes. So some Councils at least simply stopped servicing the cameras!

I do say "allegedly" - and I have also heard in some areas that has been reversed, putting the instruments back in action.

They do seem to work though!

Those are spot-speed recorders, but our motorways also have average-speed cameras in some places; particularly on the so-called "managed" ones that have illuminated signs displaying temporary speed limits and sometimes lane-closures to ease congestion ahead or for safety past road-works. It is noticeable that the majority of drivers do obey them pretty closely; and one reason for that might be the number of vehicles now fitted with cruise-control. Although that is set by the driver, it reduces the temptation to edge over the limit; and it also keeps the following drivers to the limit if they cannot overtake.
Dlrannie · 31-35, F
I never realised sheep could move that fast 😂😂😋🐑
SW-User
@Dlrannie youd be surprised when they are being chased by a drunk randy welshman in wellies haha
senghenydd · M
@Dlrannie I haven't seen a sheep in years they've all moved to England I expect and this 20 MPH is really slow I've had time to consider this.
Last I checked people couldn't walk 20 mph. How do they figure lowering the speed limit will get people to increase both their commute time and effort required to make their commute by walking rather than driving?
senghenydd · M
@SooperSarah You have a good point more cycle lanes are needed in our towns and cities, and better public transport.
@senghenydd cycle lanes also have very limited usage. People traveling solo with little to no cargo. I'm not sure what the weather is generally like theren but that plays huge into walking and cycling as well.
senghenydd · M
@SooperSarah I've had two days to consider this 20 mph restriction I was driving around in Newport Gwent which is a city in Wales and to be honest I was finding 20 mph very slow, this restriction is going to be a pain, where I live we have a number of disused railway lines which are now cycle paths, they are used all the year round by cyclists and walkers being old railway lines they are flatter than most roads in this area.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
senghenydd · M
@SW-User Just as well go back to the horse and cart said one SWer, well it is slow very slow.
wildbill83 · 41-45, M
the UK is so backwards these days, they might as well go back to horse & carriage...
Peril · F
@wildbill83 the UK is "so backwards", coming from an American???!!! Well at least you've got a sense of humour 😆 🤣 🤣
TexChik · F
@SooperSarah 85 in Texas!
wildbill83 · 41-45, M
@Peril given that the UK intends to ban the sale of fossil fuel powered vehicles by 2040 (they're even pushing to do it sooner...) so yep, pretty backwards...🤔
Tastyfrzz · 61-69, M
20 mph!? I'm not sure my cars can go that slow. Even with my foot off the gas it would probably be going 30 mph![media=https://youtu.be/wREBD2og5iY]
SW-User
@Tastyfrzz Get on your bike then :P
Tastyfrzz · 61-69, M
@SW-User wrist won't allow it. Fell off and broke it some years back.
SW-User
@Tastyfrzz Fair enough. Well, where I live there are some 20 mph zones and my car does just fine :)
KiwiBird · 36-40, F
Need flag person walking in front of each conveyance.
helenS · 36-40, F
These are very good news. In Europe, about 20,000 people are killed in a road crash every year. Establishing a speed limit of 20mph (=30kmh) would greatly increase the safety of all people in our streets.
Slade · 56-60, M
@helenS 0 MPH would eliminate all accidents. They can just stagger everywhere like Dawn of the Dead
helenS · 36-40, F
@Slade Yes but people would die of hunger at 0 MPH 😏
Slade · 56-60, M
@helenS Yes but not getting hit by European golf cart cars (which weigh less than American motor bikes).

Now the natives will be safe to marry their livestock
Longpatrol · 31-35, M
Speeds ⬇️
Road Rage ⬆️
SW-User
We've had a 20mph speed limit in our town for a few years. It's fair to say it's divided opinion but I think it's fine.
helenS · 36-40, F
@SW-User How many people have been injured or killed in road crashes since the speed limit was established in your town, please?
SW-User
@helenS I don't have the figures and it's a small town anyway so I don't think the figures would be at all meaningful. A lot of people still drive above 20mph, but in general speeds are reduced. It's always fun to stick to 20mph and annoy the impatient drivers stuck behind me 🤣. I remember when I lived in Germany there were very low speed limits by schools and playgrounds, 7kph maybe, I don't think anyone complained.
gol979 · 41-45, M
😂😂 more government control. Shocked i tell thee
senghenydd · M
@gol979 There's more and more cars on the UK's roads and when they're not being driven their parked in our streets, where I live there are cars parked either side of the road leaving only one lane to access so I'm driving close to parked cars either side it is a safety problem and actually 10 MPH is a safe speed this new law will divide the motoring public for years to come.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@senghenydd so just keep it the way it was. Its not "unsafe". Its ridiculous
senghenydd · M
@gol979 No doubt lives will be saved I will make a note of the number of people killed on the roads in Wales five years before this law is established and then for five years after and let the world know whether it was worth while or not.
ididntknow · 51-55, M
You’ll be getting a fine for walking too fast soon, and another fine for farting too much, it’s the environment you know
WandererTony · 56-60, M
Doesn't make sense in my part of the world. We need to move fast or we end up not earning enough to beat the interest on our loans!! 😀
trackboy · 22-25, M
it is time to shoot as many pigs 🐖 as you can as its the pigs that came up with this instance plan@@@
senghenydd · M
@trackboy It's the Welsh government who have made this law no doubt other organisations influenced their decision, Welsh Government is feeling their feet who knows where their power will end, their increasing Council Tax on extensions their bringing new laws all the time, they have increased their number from sixty to ninety six members no stopping them now they have the power.
SW-User
Newyddion da iawn!
senghenydd · M
@SW-User It's has certainly surprised a lot of people, I have discussed this with local people and it's a very divided issue.
SW-User
@senghenydd Yup, but I'm sure it will soon be widely accepted and then people will realise that it was actually worth doing hopefully. Fewer accidents, less pollution, who knows maybe fewer cars...?
senghenydd · M
@SW-User This new law in Wales could also be made law in the rest of the UK if the statistics result in reduced accidents in our built up areas.
The main roads through my estate have been 20mph for years.
Does anyone take any notice?
No...not even the cops!
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
I don’t get it.
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
@SW-User I have and it’s clear to me this is what Wales is like and what you look like. Enjoy your non moving cars!

[image/video deleted]

[image/video deleted]
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
@SW-User That comment makes perfect sense from someone who thinks a 20 mph speed limit is a good idea.

See ya, Bilbo.
They can reduce the speed limit all they want , but if they dont put in infrastructure for bikes and busses and such , it wont make people use their cars less.

We have a 40kmph limit in some states in aus for residential roads and urban and city streets, and all the bikes do is cause angst and agression as bushbikes arent registered . So if a pushbiker clips your mirror or scratches your car, youre screwed .

We have so much road agression between pushbikers and other vehicles.

It is safer for pedestrians though.
I've heard of a few near misses , even collisions that could have been fatal, but weren't.
senghenydd · M
@OogieBoogie We have a few Bus lanes in the UK and there are new laws for cyclists on UK roads however like most countries we need more cycle lanes I live in Wales where there are many mountains which makes life difficult for cycles so there aren't that many anyway.

 
Post Comment