This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
CedricH · 22-25, M
Can be easily vetoed assuming it even passes the Senate.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@CedricH
Yes, it could. But unlike the response to the preliminary War Powers Act vote, Trump hasn't threatened any of the 17 Republicans - yet.
It might be a sense of recognition that NOT approving the subsidies could sink the Republicans' hopes of retaining control of the House.
And Trump even acknowledged the other day that he knows what loss of the House will mean.
Yes, it could. But unlike the response to the preliminary War Powers Act vote, Trump hasn't threatened any of the 17 Republicans - yet.
It might be a sense of recognition that NOT approving the subsidies could sink the Republicans' hopes of retaining control of the House.
And Trump even acknowledged the other day that he knows what loss of the House will mean.
CedricH · 22-25, M
@beckyromero And yet you‘re rooting for the bill, huh? Well let them kill it and lose the midterms. For me it’s a win-win. For you it’s at least a win
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@CedricH
Of course I want the subsidies to be funded. One needs to look at what the bill is about and who it is helping - and who will be hurting without the subsidies.
Of course I want the subsidies to be funded. One needs to look at what the bill is about and who it is helping - and who will be hurting without the subsidies.


