@
MarthannBann888 Man... Don't get Trump in here, because he was literally supported by... what you call: "lieing democrats".
If people have the option to divorce, that's not a KKK-program. People do it on their own terms. The option of divorce excited long before the 1960s, but I guess religion lost their stranglehold on a lot of people, so people make diffrence choices in the 1960s then in the 18 hunderds. It's not driven by a governement, unless you are going to argue that a governement NEEDS to keep people married and religious. In which case, well that's a KKK thing. Because these people are authoritarian christians, they just don't care about anyone they don't consider white.
The bills to improve voting for black people? Are you argueing that white people know better and thus should vote in the black peoples interest? And if so... how many times did that happen in the US?
Your bills to improve voting for black do the opposite. Not only that, but black people are in danger of thought to be in league with democrats to use crooked voting laws to chest on elections be "mailing in thousands of false ballots".
Where is the proof for all these claims?
Instead, you have sought division in the country by lying and saying how prejudice republicans are just because republicans would have all people to be more independent then depending on the work of others. I wonder your motive could possibly be to do so much harm to the people of this country.
Yes, so all the black people need to compete with all those white folk that amassed wealth during the years black people were oppressed. Giving people equal starting chances is a bad thing, and it will surely not help the demographic that has been set back by historical devolpments. That's the same thing that Atwater was selling to white people:
[media=https://youtu.be/AT2fsv7xt4E]
White people that vote... republican after 1964. That's why the south changed from Blue to Red after the non-southern democrats signed the civil rights act. I guess you missed that part in History too.
Seeking "division"? when you start off naming an ex-president and a demagogue that put people against eachother in the most radical way possible. Are you kidding? Ignorant? Or just stupid.