Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I can't count how many times people have said, "The Bible condones slavery". Firstly, what most people have in mind when they think of slavery is the

modern usage of the word that refers to the African slave trade or racial slavery, which the Bible most certainly does not condone. In fact, the Bible explicitly condemns the type of slavery that most people have in mind, as typified in the Atlantic slave trade.

Exodus 21:6 - And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death.

Not only does the Bible condemn it, but it puts the death penalty on it.

Secondly, the KJV Bible only uses the word slave one time and the word slaves one time and context has nothing to do with anything that is in God's law or anything that God condones. The time that slavery is mentioned in Revelation 18:3, it mentions slavery as something that is practiced by a wicked, heathen nation.

Most of the time, the Bible uses the word servant and it is either referring to employment or indentured servitude. Indentured servitude is allowed and has a max of 6 years and this has to do with someone working for someone to pay off a debt. That is one type of slavery that the Bible does condone, which makes perfect sense. This is kind of like in the movies where someone can't pay their bill at a restaurant and has to wash dishes. That's right. By the way, indentured servitude is far better than our prison industrial complex. What do we do today? If someone racks up some huge bill that they can't pay, you just end up getting stiffed, you don't get paid and there's nothing you can do about it or people will just go bankrupt. That is not right, you are supposed to pay what you borrowed. In the case where someone steals from someone else, the thief goes to prison which our tax dollars has to pay for. How is this fair? What exactly is good about this system? And Is it not slavery to be locked up behind bars? But modern man is so much smarter, right? No.

Listen, locking someone in prison is more inhumane than slavery. Prison destroys people's lives and permanently damages their record and makes it harder for them to get a job. 85% off people who go into prison, their spouse divorces them. It destroys their life and it is cruel and unusual punishment. Human beings are not designed to be locked in a cage, especially not solitary confinement, It makes people go insane. We in the United States have the largest prison population in the world and vast majority of people in there are there for non-violent crimes. People don't go on about that but then they want to go on about how the Bible condones slavery. It is basically this emotionally charged word where people don't stop and think and study what the Bible actually teaches.

If you steal from someone or damage their property and you don't have the money to pay them back, then you should have to work for them to pay it off and be their bondservant. This is completely fair. It is not that God is promoting "slavery", it is that God is making allowance for "slavery" in certain situations, like people can't pay a bill, prisoners of war or criminals. And the masters in these cases are told to treat their servants well and in a just manner. But say if that servant is not doing what they are supposed to be doing, like not working at all and eating the masters food, then of course some form of punishment has to be inflicted, hence why there is physical discipline described in Luke 12:47. This is logical. This is reality. This is the real world, folks, and we need practical solutions to deal with the sinful heart of man, not idealism and utopianism which always leads to disaster, degeneracy and chaos. The Bible is a practical book that has the answer to everything.

So, the type of so called slavery that God did allow is right. God is always right about everything.

Did you know that if you're lost today, you are a slave to sin, dead in trespasses and sins. But you can be made free.

Romans 6:22 - But now being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life.

Romans 6:18 - Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of righteousness.

John 8:36 - If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.

John 8:32 - And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

John 14:6 - Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

You see, Jesus Christ is the truth and the truth shall make you free. Jesus Christ is the only one who can free you from the prison that you are currently in. That prison is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth. It is a prison that you cannot taste or see or touch. A prison for your mind. You feel that something is deeply wrong and can see it when you look out your window or when you turn on your television. You can feel it when you go to work, when you pay your taxes. Satan has your mind blinded right now and has you robotically walking according to the course of this world, according to his course.

2 Corinthians 4:4 - In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.

Take the blindfold off and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ today. Be set free from the matrix.

Romans 3:23 - For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;

Romans 6:23 - For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

Romans 5:8 - But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.

Romans 10:9-10 - That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
walabby · 70-79, M
Exodus 21.

20 “Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, 21 but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property.

Leviticus 25.

44 “‘Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. 45 You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. 46 You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.
Perhaps the greatest missed opportunity of the New Testament was the chance to decry the capture and ownership of human beings. Why didn’t Jesus simply say slavery is wrong? We know it is wrong. Why didn’t he? He could have said, “I humbly apologize. My father—I mean I myself—was stuck in a primitive patriarchal mindset where the possession and abuse of human beings was perceived as economically prudent, but I have come to abolish that cruel institution and emancipate all captive people.” God changed his mind on other matters, so why not here? He could have eliminated slavery more than 1,800 years before the American Civil War, saving rivers of blood and oppression. Instead, he talks about human bondage as if it were the most natural order, incorporating it into his parables as if he or his writers were simply reflecting their own culture at the time.

I suppose we should award Jesus a few points of compassion for pointing out that some slaves should not be beaten as hard as others:

“That slave who knew what his master wanted, but did not prepare himself or do what was wanted, will receive a severe beating. But the one who did not know and did what deserved a beating will receive a light beating."(Luke 12:47–48)

Jesus understood that punishment should match the offense, but he didn’t see the larger offense, the bigger picture. (Those words, by the way, are not part of a parable—they are the direct thoughts immediately following a parable.) Jesus accepted the institution of bondage and encouraged the beating of slaves. He blew his chance to become a true moral leader.”

Excerpt From: "God" Dan Barker
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@RobinRightwild
you can't even justify good and evil

I rely on my personal perception and moral judgement. I don't need to be told what to think - I think for myself

you have no absolute standard of right and wrong

Nor do you. Making unsupported claims around a book doesn't make anything absolute
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
RobinRightwild · 31-35, M
@newjaninev2 https://similarworlds.com/science/5139747-We-know-the-Bible-is-inspired-because-of-mathematical
Dan McClellan has a video explaining how the Bible does in fact condone slavery. This is supported by the original text even if the KJV mistranslates it. Southern antebellum slave owners also justified slavery based on the Bible and Christianity. The ultra-Christian North Carolina gubernatorial candidate Mark Robinson also advocates for the return of slavery.

That doesn’t mean all modern Christians go along with this, but you don’t have to misrepresent what the Bible says to whitewash this.
RobinRightwild · 31-35, M
@LeopoldBloom The TEXTUS RECEPTUS, original Greek text from which the Authorized King James Bible was translated, has been the target of textual critics since 1611. Yet copies of it substantially exist today without error.

THE PURE FOUNDATION OF THE KING JAMES VERSION
The Old Testament of the King James Bible was translated from the Masoretic Text. This text was in use during the time of Christ and He quoted from them many times. If the Masoretic Text was acceptable to Christ then it certainly should be accepted by every child of God. This text was kept pure by the Hebrew priests who were given the responsibility of caring for it.

The New Testament of the King James Version was translated in 1611 A.D. from the Greek manuscripts known today as the Textus Receptus. The scholars who did this work were giants in their field. They were far superior to the self-proclaimed scholars in Biblical criticism who are responsible for the rash of modern perversions.

The Textus Receptus from which the King James Bible was translated is a faithful reproduction of the original manuscripts, which were penned by the writers of the Scriptures. The T. R. or Traditional Text as it is also called has been traced back to the early church.

THE CHRONOLOGY OF THE KING JAMES VERSION
From the birth of Christ to 100 A.D. the original manuscripts were written in the Greek language.
The New Testament was compiled by 400 A.D.
by 170 A.D. -- 20 N.T. books had been accepted by the early Christians.

by 400 A.D. -- all 27 books of the N.T. had been accepted by the early Christians as they were guided by the Holy Spirit.

The Holy Spirit guided so that only the genuine books were included.

The Holy Spirit also guided in the selection of the pure manuscripts.

The Holy Spirit so guided that false gospels and manuscripts were set aside.
the original manuscripts were lost but the Received Text that was produced during this time was a faithful reproduction of the original autographs.

452-1453 A.D. -- The Textus Receptus was used by the Greek Church during this time under the direction of the Holy Spirit.

1516 A.D. -- Erasmus edited the first printing of the Greek N.T.

This was in agreement with the Textus Receptus.

1526 A.D. -- Tyndale's New Testament in English was printed. He was burned at the stake in 1536 because he had the Bible printed in English.

1550 A.D. -- Stephens Greek N.T. (Textus Receptus).

1611 A.D. -- The King James or Authorised Version of the Bible was translated from the Greek Textus Receptus in the N.T. and Hebrew Masoretic Text in the O.T.

1611 A.D. -- To the present. Infidels and assorted enemies of the Bible have attacked our Bible in every way known to man, but God's Word shall abide forever.

I thank God for my salvation and I thank Him for preserving His Written Word for my use and for all who will rest in Him. I am convinced that the King James Bible I hold in my hand is a completely faithful reproduction of the Word of God. I can hold my Bible in my hand and say without fear that I am in possession of the Word of God that has been passed down from generation to generation by the providential protection of my Heavenly Father.
RobinRightwild · 31-35, M
@LeopoldBloom The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, PURIFIED SEVEN TIMES. - Psalms 12:6
English is the seventh language the Bible was written in. The seven languages recorded in history that the Bible was first written in are as follow:

1. Hebrew
2. Aramaic
3. Greek
4. Old Syriac
5. Old Latin
6. German
7. English

The King James Bible is the seventh English Bible to have its roots in the Masoretic text, (Hebrew Old Testament text) and the Textus Receptus, (Greek New Testament text).The Textus Receptus was preserved in Antioch Syria (where the disciples were first called Christians - Acts 11:26).

The first six English Bibles of the sixteenth century led to the seventh and final and perfect English, the KJB. The seven English Bibles from the proper manuscripts are as follows:

1. Tyndale New Testament 1526
2. Coverdale Bible. 1535
3. Matthew's Bible 1537
4. Great Bible 1539
5. Geneva Bible 1560
6. Bishop's Bible 1568
7. Authorized Version 1611

They were all part of the purification stages, Psalms 12:6-7, "The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times." 7. "Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever."

The 6 Modern English translations leading up to the KJV were all translated from various editions of what we call today the Greek "Textus Receptus." The first several of these printed Greek editions were published by Desiderius Erasmus, and later editions used to produce the Geneva Bible and Bishops Bible were published by Robert Estienne a.k.a Stephanus. The KJV translators also translated from the Greek Textus Receptus, using the editions of Erasmus, Stephanus, and Beza.

Modern Bible versions are translated from a completely different source. They are translated by critical texts edited by Nestle/Aland and the United Bible Societies in the 20th Century. These modern Greek editions are based on corrupt manuscripts like Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus, as well as more recent Egyptian papyri discoveries. It is not a coincidence that Egypt is the source of the corruption underlying modern perversions like the NIV, ESV, NLT, etc.

The 6 Bibles leading up to the KJV were all translated from the Textus Receptus (the correct Greek textual tradition) and are therefore consistent with the KJV. They agree with the KJV. The modern versions, on the other hand, are dramatically different. Therefore, if a person accepts the modern Bible versions as accurate, they are not only rejecting the King James Version. They are also rejecting every English Bible that came before it! According to them, every English translation before the 20th Century has been wrong!

The King James Bible is the culmination of the 6 Bibles that led up to it. It is the culmination of almost 100 years of scholarship and sacrifice that gave us our English Bible. That is why the 6 earlier translations eventually went out of print, and the KJV became the standard English Bible used by virtually all Christians until recently. People recognized that the KJV was the final draft of the English Bible, so it replace the 6 rough drafts that led up to it. The 6 Bibles before the KJV were good Bibles, and the KJV could never have been the magnificent Bible that it is without having had those 6 excellent rough drafts.

God has gone to all the trouble to inspire the perfect originals. He has collated the books of the Old Testament and New Testament and documented their authenticity. He has preserved His words against attack from Roman Catholic tyrants and Alexandrian philosophers. This process has cost Him the lives, homes, and families of some of His most faithful servants. He assembled the very best scholars in history and had them translate it into the world’s language (English) in its absolutely purest form.
RobinRightwild · 31-35, M
@LeopoldBloom But you will reject all of this because you reject history and truth. You reject God's word and you are an unbeliever so you cannot Understand Biblical Truth. You won’t be able to understand the Bible properly until you accept Christ as your Savior. This is the real problem. Most cults are started by people who attempt to study the Bible without the presence of the Author. The Holy Spirit is the Author. The Bible is a spiritual book and it is NOT supposed to make sense to unbelievers... “But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are FOOLISHNESS UNTO HIM: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned” (1st Corinthians 2:14).
eMortal · M
You're not far from the truth. 👍🏻
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@eMortal And yet just far enough for it to be a lie.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment