Top | Newest First | Oldest First
if someone moves away you could go visit. Talk to them on the phone. Video call them, write them a letter and receive a reply. Cant really do any of that stuff if the person is dead.
View 1 more replies »
@Pikachu I am an atheist and no of course not
@OggggO
I don't think we need to be inventing reasons why the analogy doesn't need to be 1:1 lol
The point being that there seems to be a difference between someone simply not being where you are and someone being lost to you forever. A distinction which doesn't seem very real given the Christian worldview.
I don't think we need to be inventing reasons why the analogy doesn't need to be 1:1 lol
The point being that there seems to be a difference between someone simply not being where you are and someone being lost to you forever. A distinction which doesn't seem very real given the Christian worldview.
CopperCicada · M
My work at hospice has taught me that grief is very private and individual. Don't try to correlate it with religious world views. It doesn't work that way. It is about loss, finality, discontinuity. It's about memory, intimacy. About needs not being met. The possibility of them being met gone. It's about the personal needs of those left behind. Believing the person passed is beyond suffering with God, or rotting in the ground, doesn't help. It's not part of it.
@CopperCicada
This is all heartbreaking to me.
I just wonder why it would be as heartbreaking to someone who believes that after a time of separation they will be reunited.
Although i do find more compelling the examples of folks whose personal identity is so wrapped up with their partner. That resonates for me because my partner defines my life as well.
This is all heartbreaking to me.
I just wonder why it would be as heartbreaking to someone who believes that after a time of separation they will be reunited.
Although i do find more compelling the examples of folks whose personal identity is so wrapped up with their partner. That resonates for me because my partner defines my life as well.
CopperCicada · M
@Pikachu It needs to be and should be heartbreaking. This is what makes us human. Evolutionary biology has given us an attachment system for survival. A variety of researchers have written about and studied this. We don’t want our spiritual beliefs to turn this off.
SW-User
Surely it would just be the sadness of a loved one moving away or something right?
No, if they moving I can still go visit them and touch them. I can still call them, I can hear their voice, I can message them, I can celebrate birthdays and buy them gifts and be witness to their joy. I can share beautiful and sad moments. So no it's nothing like them just moving away.
@SW-User
Yup. They do try to make sense of it.
Yup. They do try to make sense of it.
SW-User
@Pikachu It wouldn't require faith otherwise
@SW-User
I guess not
I guess not
Nanori · F
Ye I always tell my religious family if u believe in an afterlife and u love that person so much that u think they're going to heaven... Then what are u crying about?
Ceinwyn · 26-30, F
Grieving isn’t unique to Christian’s. I know you apparently hate Christians considering the time you dedicate to them, but the rest of us non Christian’s feel the loss of a loved one just as keenly.
@Ceinwyn
1) i think you've misunderstood me if you think i am suggesting that grieving is uniquely Christian or if you think i believe that non-Christians feel loss less severely...i mean, i literally suggest the opposite lol
2) I'm sorry if you've got the impression that i hate Christians. I absolutely don't. I think they're wrong about their worldview, i contest them where they deny science and i enjoy debating what i view as problematic elements, stories or beliefs from their faith...but i certainly don't Hate Christians.
One of my best friends of 20 years (on Tuesday) is a Christian. I don't hate her lol
1) i think you've misunderstood me if you think i am suggesting that grieving is uniquely Christian or if you think i believe that non-Christians feel loss less severely...i mean, i literally suggest the opposite lol
2) I'm sorry if you've got the impression that i hate Christians. I absolutely don't. I think they're wrong about their worldview, i contest them where they deny science and i enjoy debating what i view as problematic elements, stories or beliefs from their faith...but i certainly don't Hate Christians.
One of my best friends of 20 years (on Tuesday) is a Christian. I don't hate her lol
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@Ceinwyn
It's not necessary to be a Christian or even a human to feel the loss of a loved one. You just have to be a typical animal. While such grieving behavior is normal it is not a good idea or beneficial to do it for an extended period. It is necessary to be able to put it all behind you after a certain time or else you will become depressed, get sick, and die. That is reality. The Bible suggests a maximum time of about a week.
Grieving isn’t unique to Christian’s. I know you apparently hate Christians considering the time you dedicate to them, but the rest of us non Christian’s feel the loss of a loved one just as keenly.
It's not necessary to be a Christian or even a human to feel the loss of a loved one. You just have to be a typical animal. While such grieving behavior is normal it is not a good idea or beneficial to do it for an extended period. It is necessary to be able to put it all behind you after a certain time or else you will become depressed, get sick, and die. That is reality. The Bible suggests a maximum time of about a week.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
I think you've missed the whole concept of bereavement and loss, which cuts across all faiths and none.
You've also fallen into the common Similar Worlds trap of dividing the world into "Christians" and "Atheists" as if no other beliefs exist.
Religious faith may make the loss easier to bear and reduce the fear of death; and that seems to have been a central motive for most religions existing and extinct since, probably, Palaeolithic times. Non-believers find their way by accepting the natural process without needing a theist support.
Neither approach is right or wrong except to the bereft individual, and neither approach can remove the pain of the permanent loss. It simply makes it easier to accept.
You've also fallen into the common Similar Worlds trap of dividing the world into "Christians" and "Atheists" as if no other beliefs exist.
Religious faith may make the loss easier to bear and reduce the fear of death; and that seems to have been a central motive for most religions existing and extinct since, probably, Palaeolithic times. Non-believers find their way by accepting the natural process without needing a theist support.
Neither approach is right or wrong except to the bereft individual, and neither approach can remove the pain of the permanent loss. It simply makes it easier to accept.
SW-User
they do seem to get some comfort from their faith, from what i can tell. deep down they know nothing's the same again, though, so they weep like a human being.
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@Pikachu There is zero support for that idea in the Bible or in the Mormon version of heaven or in Islam.
@Diotrephes
lol take it up with Christians. That's what they're taught in church. That's what many of them believe.
There are a few mentions of eternal life when you accept god so i dunno.
lol take it up with Christians. That's what they're taught in church. That's what many of them believe.
There are a few mentions of eternal life when you accept god so i dunno.
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@Pikachu
IMO, that is a BS belief because it has no support in the fairy tales. While Islam does say that children can go to paradise the Bible does not even hint that children will get into the golden cube or even be judged on Judgment Day. In the Mormon version the good guy gets his own planet and harem and he is the God of the world and he populates it with children from his harem. As far as I know no children from this existence are involved.
Maybe someone can cite some relevant passages that will prove me wrong but I doubt it.
lol take it up with Christians. That's what they're taught in church. That's what many of them believe.
There are a few mentions of eternal life when you accept god so i dunno.
There are a few mentions of eternal life when you accept god so i dunno.
IMO, that is a BS belief because it has no support in the fairy tales. While Islam does say that children can go to paradise the Bible does not even hint that children will get into the golden cube or even be judged on Judgment Day. In the Mormon version the good guy gets his own planet and harem and he is the God of the world and he populates it with children from his harem. As far as I know no children from this existence are involved.
Maybe someone can cite some relevant passages that will prove me wrong but I doubt it.
if a woman christian husband dies and she remarries . in the end is it polygamy ?
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
@markansas I was taught exactly that, I was tyring to make a joke :P
SW-User
I'm against mentioning specific religions, but I'll say emotion causes allegiance to any faith rather than logicality. Death is always a time where faith is challenged, so for the believer optimism compromised by a call for reason explains sadness being expressed instead of joy.
dontbekoi · 36-40, F
I don't necessarily think they are crying for their lost ones, I think they are crying because the passage of time is scary. Change is scary. Just like children, adults feel more confident and secure when their daily activities are predictable and familiar. When those familiar people die it can make us feel insecure and vulnerable.
dontbekoi · 36-40, F
@Pikachu Well, that has me thinking. I think it is a temporary form of grief - until you speak with them on the phone or see them ? - Then the grieving stops. If you never see them again, it would be a form of grief (similar to Holocaust survivors)
Grief - Intense sorrow
Loss - The feeling of grief
Grief - Intense sorrow
Loss - The feeling of grief
Moxymoxy · F
Why so sad?
Is it really so difficult to understand missing someone who means something to you?
To not be able to talk to that person anymore?
If we're reunited with souls in heaven we're still talking about being apart for a long long time.
Sometimes most of a lifetime.
Is it really so difficult to understand missing someone who means something to you?
To not be able to talk to that person anymore?
If we're reunited with souls in heaven we're still talking about being apart for a long long time.
Sometimes most of a lifetime.
@Diotrephes
lol does it?
Cain murdered his brother and then lied to god about it.
He's not getting into heaven...
Not sure how this demonstrates an unfamiliarity with the Bible...
Yup. First the dead in Christ rise and reign (over whom i'm not sure) and then the rest of us will rise and be judged.
Not really a trick question.
Also i'm still unclear as to how this relates to your notion that heaven is going to be crowded and awkward?
Can you answer that one for me? Because now it just seems like we're playing "who knows the Bible better" lol
Your answer shows that you do not know the biblical fairy tale
lol does it?
Cain murdered his brother and then lied to god about it.
He's not getting into heaven...
Not sure how this demonstrates an unfamiliarity with the Bible...
Yup. First the dead in Christ rise and reign (over whom i'm not sure) and then the rest of us will rise and be judged.
Not really a trick question.
Also i'm still unclear as to how this relates to your notion that heaven is going to be crowded and awkward?
Can you answer that one for me? Because now it just seems like we're playing "who knows the Bible better" lol
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@Pikachu
The Bible clearly says that "evil" people will be on the planet where "heaven" -- the golden cube called New Jerusalem - - is located. I provided chapter and verse for that. The "evil" people won't be allowed to enter the golden cube but they will see it towering 1,500 miles into the sky behind the tall wall around it. Why else would the cube need a wall around it if all of the bad people had been tossed into the lake of fire?
If you call the golden cube heaven it is sitting on a large planet and it is a golden cube 1,500 miles tall and 1,500 miles per side. Hell was tossed into the lake of fire in Revelation 20:14. So, how should the area outside of the wall be classified? It says that the "saved" can freely pass through the twelve gates. So, that must mean that the "saved" and the "dogs" who are excluded can intermingle. Isn't that wonderful? The "saved" can come out and visit their evil relatives and then return to their golden rooms after eating from the tree of life and drinking the water of life. But what will the excluded eat and drink for eternity since they will never die because Death was also tossed into the lake of fire, Revelation 20:14.
lol does it?
Cain murdered his brother and then lied to god about it.
He's not getting into heaven...
Not sure how this demonstrates an unfamiliarity with the Bible...
Yup. First the dead in Christ rise and reign (over whom i'm not sure) and then the rest of us will rise and be judged.
Not really a trick question.
Also i'm still unclear as to how this relates to your notion that heaven is going to be crowded and awkward?
Can you answer that one for me? Because now it just seems like we're playing "who knows the Bible better" lol
Cain murdered his brother and then lied to god about it.
He's not getting into heaven...
Not sure how this demonstrates an unfamiliarity with the Bible...
Yup. First the dead in Christ rise and reign (over whom i'm not sure) and then the rest of us will rise and be judged.
Not really a trick question.
Also i'm still unclear as to how this relates to your notion that heaven is going to be crowded and awkward?
Can you answer that one for me? Because now it just seems like we're playing "who knows the Bible better" lol
The Bible clearly says that "evil" people will be on the planet where "heaven" -- the golden cube called New Jerusalem - - is located. I provided chapter and verse for that. The "evil" people won't be allowed to enter the golden cube but they will see it towering 1,500 miles into the sky behind the tall wall around it. Why else would the cube need a wall around it if all of the bad people had been tossed into the lake of fire?
If you call the golden cube heaven it is sitting on a large planet and it is a golden cube 1,500 miles tall and 1,500 miles per side. Hell was tossed into the lake of fire in Revelation 20:14. So, how should the area outside of the wall be classified? It says that the "saved" can freely pass through the twelve gates. So, that must mean that the "saved" and the "dogs" who are excluded can intermingle. Isn't that wonderful? The "saved" can come out and visit their evil relatives and then return to their golden rooms after eating from the tree of life and drinking the water of life. But what will the excluded eat and drink for eternity since they will never die because Death was also tossed into the lake of fire, Revelation 20:14.
@Diotrephes
lol what is happening?
This is where we started: Would you really be comfortable meeting your ancestors of 20,000 generations ago? After all, everyone loves someone and wants to see them in paradise/heaven.
And i reckoned that such inconveniences would probably not be a huge issue...and i'm just not seeing from your admittedly well constructed descriptions from Revaluation why i should change my mind on that lol
lol what is happening?
This is where we started: Would you really be comfortable meeting your ancestors of 20,000 generations ago? After all, everyone loves someone and wants to see them in paradise/heaven.
And i reckoned that such inconveniences would probably not be a huge issue...and i'm just not seeing from your admittedly well constructed descriptions from Revaluation why i should change my mind on that lol
Carissimi · F
This is one of the most absurd questions I’ve ever read. 🤦♀️
Lilymoon · F
Perhaps it's because they'll never see them again while alive. 🤷♀️
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
Yes it should be a celebration really. Many Christians I know actually view it that way, they are sad for themselves but happy that their loved ones are with God.
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
@Pikachu Yes the Bible is confusing that way. Mainstream Christianity says or implies that our loved ones are in heaven immediately but then you have the whole second coming of Jesus and him judging at that point.
@JimboSaturn
I think the mainstream teaching isn't well supported by the Bible which makes it pretty clear that the dead are asleep, that the dead in Christ will rise first and that the rest of the dead will rise after them and be judged.
I think the mainstream teaching isn't well supported by the Bible which makes it pretty clear that the dead are asleep, that the dead in Christ will rise first and that the rest of the dead will rise after them and be judged.
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
@Pikachu Yep, but the current zeitgeist is not to tell people that , it's not what we want to hear so the priest actually say they are in heaven now. Sophisticated Christians can say "well time is irrelevant in heaven so to them its now but to people on earth the rapture is in the future etc..." The supernatural always give you an out.
robingoodfellow · M
In other words " if you're going to see them in heaven what are you crying about?"
This is just poking Christians with a stick.
And I'm a non Christian who's exhausted by Christian pontificating.
This is just poking Christians with a stick.
And I'm a non Christian who's exhausted by Christian pontificating.
@robingoodfellow
No, it's a genuine question because as an Atheist it seems to me that believing you will be reunited would be such a comfort that i can't imagine being as upset by what is apparently a temporary separation as i would by by a permanent one.
No, it's a genuine question because as an Atheist it seems to me that believing you will be reunited would be such a comfort that i can't imagine being as upset by what is apparently a temporary separation as i would by by a permanent one.
robingoodfellow · M
@Pikachu sadness over separation is a basic human emotion. This is something we all have in common and all can relate to. Doesn't matter if you're Christian or atheist or whatever your philosophy.
You have to know this. Again, I'm not Christian and I don't really expect to meet up with people I love after death. Yet I don't have to wonder why Christians grieve.
I understand the value of the science vs. faith debate. But the number of these debates you start here makes it seem like you have an agenda to make Christians question their faith, or at least point out it doesn't make sense when you hold it up to scrutiny.
It feels like trolling.
Here I am defending the Christian community.
That doesn't happen too often 😶
You have to know this. Again, I'm not Christian and I don't really expect to meet up with people I love after death. Yet I don't have to wonder why Christians grieve.
I understand the value of the science vs. faith debate. But the number of these debates you start here makes it seem like you have an agenda to make Christians question their faith, or at least point out it doesn't make sense when you hold it up to scrutiny.
It feels like trolling.
Here I am defending the Christian community.
That doesn't happen too often 😶
@robingoodfellow
I know it's natural to grieve a loss. I guess it just seems to me that to the Christian it's not the same kind of loss because they believe it's temporary.
I don't think the topics i discuss would cause the majority of Christians to question their faith since, as you recognize, my posts often focus on anti-scientific fringe interpretations of the Bible. I rarely even address any argument regarding the existence or non-existence of god.
But in general i just find the debate enjoyable.
And that's the one and only time i'll defend my motivations to you. You're welcome😉
I know it's natural to grieve a loss. I guess it just seems to me that to the Christian it's not the same kind of loss because they believe it's temporary.
an agenda to make Christians question their faith
I don't think the topics i discuss would cause the majority of Christians to question their faith since, as you recognize, my posts often focus on anti-scientific fringe interpretations of the Bible. I rarely even address any argument regarding the existence or non-existence of god.
But in general i just find the debate enjoyable.
And that's the one and only time i'll defend my motivations to you. You're welcome😉
easterniowegin · 51-55, M
There are two perspectives...
They are selfishly mourning their own worldly loss. No longer able to talk with the deceased.
They can mourn while also celebrating what the person's life was and celebrate them moving on.
They are selfishly mourning their own worldly loss. No longer able to talk with the deceased.
They can mourn while also celebrating what the person's life was and celebrate them moving on.
@easterniowegin
I wonder why the mourning enters into it at all though. At least morning someone in that way.
Like if my best friend was going to leave for a long time or even if i'd never see them again, i'd surely be sad about it...but i wouldn't be mourning the same way as if they had been killed.
I wonder why the mourning enters into it at all though. At least morning someone in that way.
Like if my best friend was going to leave for a long time or even if i'd never see them again, i'd surely be sad about it...but i wouldn't be mourning the same way as if they had been killed.
easterniowegin · 51-55, M
@Pikachu why is there a difference for you between any death and being killed? Are you just talking about tragedy or something else?
@easterniowegin
I'm just talking about the separation of death in general, divorced from the manner of death because we can all grieve someone's suffering or be thankful for a peaceful passing.
I'm just talking about the separation of death in general, divorced from the manner of death because we can all grieve someone's suffering or be thankful for a peaceful passing.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
I love it that you canucks have our feudal monarch as your head of state.
😂
I don't understand things.
Help me.
😂
I don't understand things.
Help me.
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
What about the whole ressurection of the body thing; I never really found that necessary.
@JimboSaturn
I don't know why it's necessary either.
Probably cuz folks are attached to their bodies lol
I don't know why it's necessary either.
Probably cuz folks are attached to their bodies lol
RocktheHouse · M
If your wife were to travel away to a place where you will never hear from her for 30 years or even 100 years, wouldn't you miss her?
@RocktheHouse
so you reckon that Christians are grieving because they think their loved one might go to hell?
so you reckon that Christians are grieving because they think their loved one might go to hell?
RocktheHouse · M
@Pikachu It's likely many Christians believe there's a distinct possibility their loved one could end up in a place of suffering. Most Christians are not strongly rooted in the faith.
@RocktheHouse
Maybe. But i suspect most people are convinced that their loved one would end up in heaven.
I'm not sure that's an adequate explanation .
Maybe. But i suspect most people are convinced that their loved one would end up in heaven.
I'm not sure that's an adequate explanation .