Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Should the pictures depicting Jesus As being European in appearance be removed.

No one knows exactly what Jesus looked like, and there are no known images of him from his lifetime. Art history professor Anna Swartwood House writes in The Conversation about the complicated history of the images of Christ and how historically they have served many purposes.

The portrayal of Jesus as a white, European man has come under renewed scrutiny during this period of introspection over the legacy of racism in society.

As protesters called for the removal of Confederate statues in the U.S., activist Shaun King went further, suggesting that murals and artwork depicting “white Jesus” should “come down.”

His concerns about the depiction of Christ and how it is used to uphold notions of white supremacy are not isolated. Prominent scholars and the archbishop of Canterbury have called to reconsider Jesus’ portrayal as a white man.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
Shaun King, I think, is going too far. When you create an egregore to worship, you're entitled to give him, her, or it whatever appearance you choose. White Christians can worship white jesus, black Christians can worship black Jesus (not the cartoon on Adult Swim, lol) and Hispanic Christians can worship Hispanic Jesus. I don't care what image they choose to focus on, and I wouldn't force them to picture him in a way that makes them feel uncomfortable.

The underlying problems with Christianity are much worse than what color skin Jesus has. The fact of the matter is, the New Testament contains language that condones slavery. That's what Shaun King should be worried about.