Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Creation versus Evolution. Why evolution is not sufficient to prove Bible wrong?

Bible is the holy book of Christians. It is nothing but the word of God.
Christianity should be considered for its historical viability.

We, Christians believe that God created the earth and the universe. Estimated age of earth is ~6000 years old. Some may argue that earth is billions of years old. We can term as old earth theory. But it is illogical to conclude something or question Bible without asking sufficient questions. Often people get carried away by some evidence and come to a conclusion. Evidence should be complemented by logical reasoning.

Everyone agree that Adam and Eve were the first humans created by God. When both Adam and Eve were created did they appear one day old. No. They were created as adults. Conclusions without logical reasoning and asking every possible questions are not sufficient to prove Bible wrong. Remember Bible is nothing but the word of God. Human ideas are also evolving and our science and research is improving day by day. It may not be perfect today but it may be more perfect tomorrow. Improvement is an ongoing process and perfection is never attained. Only God is perfect. Everything else is in transition. We need to ask do cosmology, geology and other sciences have evolved enough to prove Bible wrong? My belief in Jesus, our only savior helps me confidently say that Bible can never be wrong. It may be difficult for many to understand, but belief in God empowers logical reasoning.

About evolutions, can it prove Bible wrong? No. True that living beings may adapt to the environment. Let us agree that adaptations are genetically heritable and it is heritable across different environments. This is just an accumulation of data. That addresses What part of the phenomenon. But logical reasoning enables us to think about how and why ?
Why does genes behave in a particular way way ? Why does it adapt? Was it designed that way ? This is where creation/creator comes into picture. Without asking sufficient questions evolution or transitional forms is an incomplete understanding. Evolution by itself may not stand out, it may need a force to drive it.

The entire life on earth is driven by one force and I need not repeat it!
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DeluxedEdition · 26-30, F
people are too simpleminded to accept that we were created with the intention to evolve. There is no versus
BlueMetalChick · 31-35, F
@DeluxedEdition What you're describing is called scholasticism, the concept that a higher power created life with the express intention of that life evolving and changing over extended periods of time.

Is it true? It might be. No human in the world, myself included, can disprove that idea. It's a fairly benign way of reconciling the seemingly mutual exclusion between "evolution and intelligent design." I certainly think it's a lot more honest thought than young Earth creationism.
@DeluxedEdition
people are too simpleminded to accept that we were created with the intention to evolve. There is no versus

Not to contradict, but I believe what God's Word says.... we were created to reproduce godly offspring, amongst other things.
DeluxedEdition · 26-30, F
@LadyGrace there’s nothing contradicting about stating that God created us with the intention to evolve
SW-User
@DeluxedEdition Hi Deluxed. That is something i truly believe in myself. We were created, or engineered, if one prefers, and we do have the ability to evolve. There is no contradiction that i find in it.
SW-User
@DeluxedEdition I don't know how this topic came up again, but I hardly disagree with you about this. I view them as a set of stories passed down from a time when people were trying to answer life. If they found value/love in the meanings, I call that evolving.
@DeluxedEdition I think you misunderstood my answer. Or, maybe I'm misunderstanding you. 😂 What I meant was, I was not trying to contradict you.
@SW-User I believe there is. I just wrote an article as to why, but will put it up later, when more people are up and awake, because I put much effort and study into it, so I'd like more people to view it. ☺ If they so choose.
DeluxedEdition · 26-30, F
@SW-User we were created with the intention to experience our lives. It’s naive to assume that at no point that we wouldn’t change or “evolve” to become accustomed to our environment in that significant of a time frame
DeluxedEdition · 26-30, F
@SW-User absolutely! You said it very well
DeluxedEdition · 26-30, F
@LadyGrace no worries we are just having a discussion 🤗
@DeluxedEdition 😀🤗
SW-User
@DeluxedEdition Yes i agree. I was agreeing with you in the reply too :) 💜 Perhaps i did not word it very well :D
DeluxedEdition · 26-30, F
@LadyGrace @SW-User irregardless if anyone agrees or disagrees that’s okay it’s just a nice discussion to learn new things and share ideas

I love to learn and hear about different perspectives
@DeluxedEdition Agreed. Never said otherwise.