Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE 禄

WOKE CRAZINESS

If recent reports are to be believed the RAF are now stopping white males from signing up , so they can increase the number of women and ethnic minorities.
Have you ever heard anything more stupid in your life?
IF it's true.
We no longer want white British men in the Royal Air Force.
Dear God, we are ruled by the insane.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies 禄
Elessar26-30, M
Repeat after me:

芦Before getting outraged at random things I find on the internet, I'll make sure the source is legit禄
LizOwen41-45, F
@Elessar The source is legit.
Repeat after me:
Before being sarcastic, look in the mirror and see if my words apply to myself.
Elessar26-30, M
@LizOwen No it's not, as it's been already explained to you by other commenters.
LizOwen41-45, F
@Elessar Reports in more than one national newspaper would suggest a reputable source.
Now go and play with your little friends.
Elessar26-30, M
@LizOwen Ah yes, because newspapers owned by elitist billionaires never ever write baity over-sensationalist articles using extremely weak first-party source material to inflate their views or copies sold. Never happened in history thus far! 馃ゴ

Keep getting outraged at things you read on the internet and at people who point it out, I suppose. Y'all bunch love your "two minutes of hate" so much that even a suggestion to double-check what you're getting outraged about sparks an irrationally hostile reaction.

Quick, vote in some fascist so that at the little price of screwing your country for good AT LEAST they'll make these damn minorities silent! /s
LizOwen41-45, F
@Elessar https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/08/16/raf-recruitment-chief-quits-amid-row-pause-hiring-white-men/
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11116917/RAF-jobs-boss-quits-amid-claims-offers-white-men-paused-meet-diversity-targets.html

Reputable newspapers, son. Not papers given to sensationalism
Now kindly grow up.
Elessar26-30, M
@LizOwen

Sure buddy, sure.
basilfawlty8931-35, M
@LizOwen lol The Daily Mail reputable? You'd make an excellent comedian.
Elessar26-30, M
@basilfawlty89 This wokeism is taking over the world! I've seen it on FOX and Breitbart it must be true /s
LizOwen41-45, F
@basilfawlty89 Try the telegraph - probably one of the most reputable in the world
gol97941-45, M
@Elessar @basilfawlty89 your hypocrisy knows no bounds.....cant be calling out the msm now guys. Bit late for that.

How about engaging with the subject? Are quotas based on pigmentation and gender equitable?
Elessar26-30, M
@LizOwen Weird definition of reputable you have
Elessar26-30, M
@gol979 How's life in Scampia, did you move there yet? away from the government finally?
gol97941-45, M
@Elessar of course you dont engage with the subject.....an empty wind bag
Elessar26-30, M
@gol979 Of course you don't move your little vulnerable a$s away from the safety guaranteed by the very same law and government you despise. An empty wind bag, indeed
basilfawlty8931-35, M
@gol979 listen, if you think all of the "mainstream media" is lying, then you need to go back to your bunker.

The Daily Mail has been sued before for libel. That makes my point.
Elessar26-30, M
@basilfawlty89 It's gol, what do you expect? He's living in a constant state of paranoia where anything resembling an authority is after him to inject him with the "deadly" covid vaccine
gol97941-45, M
@basilfawlty89 but you were following them word for word the last few years, especially in the case of medical interventions.

Anyway, back to the OP.....do you think its equitable to employee people based on pigmentation and gender quotas?
Elessar26-30, M
@gol979 [quote]especially in the case of medical interventions. [/quote]
Here comes the circus 馃帾
basilfawlty8931-35, M
@gol979 I have never followed The Daily Mail. I followed reputable news sources such Associated Press and Reuters.

I also gather my information based on what scientific papers say, not some blowhard on Facebook.
basilfawlty8931-35, M
@gol979 yes, I do.

Those people have the same skills, they were just previously discriminated against because of colour and gender. This puts a wrong right. Those people are equally skilled, they're just getting a preference to correct past injustices. This is called equity.
gol97941-45, M
@basilfawlty89 Anyway, back to the OP.....do you think its equitable to employee people based on pigmentation and gender quotas?
gol97941-45, M
@basilfawlty89 that sounds like discrimination to me. "Equity = exclusion"
basilfawlty8931-35, M
@gol979 it's not. You probably think white people face racism because of affirmative action too. There's no such thing as reverse racism.
gol97941-45, M
@basilfawlty89 nope. Pigmentation isnt a thing for me. I recognise structural classism and racism. You might hate yourself and think certain pigmentation need "punishing". Your version of equity creates further division and exclusion
basilfawlty8931-35, M
@gol979 wtf are you on about. It's not pigment, it is race. White is a race, black is a race. People were oppressed for being black. When you've suffered hundreds of years of slavery, lynching, segregation, etc. then you can whine about discrimination. Your fee fees hurt isn't racism.