All a bit silly as we know that Hitler shot him self after bringing down a Gotterdamerung of destruction on the German people as a punishment for losing the war. He believed that all Germans should die rather than surrender as a punishment for them for losing the war . The last desperate act of the atheistic regime which was determined to destroy Christianity in Germany after the Jews.
I'm not sure Hitler's religious views or the broader religiosity of Nazis in general is a settled matter but neither is relevant in the context of this hypothetical scenario.
No, the question is unrealistic. The relevance of the question is not in whether the scenario is realistic but in the moral implications of the answer.
The fact is that Christians believe that all judgement is ultimately given to God and it is not up to us to judge. So who am I to judge in your hypothetical case? You remind me of these ancient philosophers he used to argue about how many angels could balance on a pin@Pikachu
I’m interested in reality which obviously you are not. You obviously have no understanding of Hitler or Christianity or you wouldn’t ask such a question. @Pikachu
I'm not demanding an objective, evidence-based conclusion. I'm asking people to think through a moral dilemma. There is no requirement to participate.
Well, then, let's put it into practical terms the atheist could compare it to. If there was a scientist who was once a Christian that wanted to join an atheist club and a Christian who didn't believe in evolution which would you let join your club?
