How to identify when an atheist is losing an argument

[b]How to identify when a believer is losing an argument [/b]
(I myself never brought up religion or the Bible. I just asked how a living being can create matter and energy and mold it into the cosmos we reside in. If it isn’t magic, what kind of being could pull off such a task, still be living billions of years , and maintain a spiritual interest in everyone living ?)
1) Believes there is a creator - denied being a creationist
2) Denied being a creationist- because creationist believe for religious reasons.
3) Resents being unable to justify first two claims , and takes it personally.
4) spreads misinformation, and false claims, when can’t admit to
losing an argument .
5) Uses stereotypes, to evade direct questions and personal opinions.

Until someone can prove god’s ( or a creator ) existence one way or another the outcome will always be a push. No winner.
You come here, you put out your opinion on the subject, you’re gonna get feedback. You may not like it. But don’t think people will back down just because you don’t like it.

Care to give us an example or two ?
[quote]
Axeroberts · 56-60, M
@DocSavage but that label implies a person thinks the world is 6000 years old. And it is a great way for you to avoid specific beliefs by redirecting. And atheists believe it all came out of nowhere.
[/quote]
[quote]
Axeroberts · 56-60, M
@DocSavage but some people cannot accept why I believe. And that's fine. But it seems obvious with the same evidence the criteria changes. No proof but you believe in aliens based on the numbers but you won't accept a person's feelings as equal criteria [/quote]
[quote]
Axeroberts · 56-60, M
@Emosaur that's the problem right there. you want to label me
[/quote]
[quote]
Axeroberts · 56-60, M
@BohemianBoo typical atheist. Doesn't listen but likes to label others as if you know. Another atheist who likes to twist things so they can believe they won a non-existent argument. But hey you have proved the point I am making on this post so I will give you that 🤣
[/quote]

[quote]
Axeroberts · 56-60, M
@BlueSkyKing that's his opinion and maybe yours. But it seems strange to listen to an atheist talk about faith. Obviously something he knows nothing about. 🤣 [/quote]
“ it seems strange to listen to an Atheist talk about faith. Obviously something he knows nothing about “
And you wonder why people resent believers.

One common Biblical verse used when the ardent "true christian" is faced with an argument based on any logical philosophical point:-

[i]Not many wise are chosen[/i] (from 1 Corinthians)

Thus blind ignorance is in effect exalted - which obviously isn't the intent of the verse, but it is used for that purpose.

😀

Another one - from the same book - used often when an opponent says that something claimed by the "true christian" doesn't make sense is:-

[i]But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.[/i]

Once again, the assumption of being correct and therefore "justified' is the core of the "true christians" quoting of the verse. They waft away, full of their own spiritual discernment, however fundamentally ridiculous and nonsensical their belief is.

In effect, such verses lock the "true christian" into a box that only genuine Grace and Mercy will rescue them from

they threaten you with punishments from the bible?..

I know what you're up to! You're simply - and I do mean simply - being sarcastic again🤣🤣🤣
This is how I'll always see you🤣🤣🤣

To true! And look at them come out in force on this post. 🤦‍♂️

And after name calling it's swearing and general abusiveness! Do they really think they're doing their cause any good by being abusive??

Arguing about religion is a waste of time. People either have faith or they don’t. You can’t have faith without revelation, not everyone can fathom it.

I would have lead with "play the logical fallacy card, and curtly so, without justifying the invocation of its name" but now it looks like you can add "downvoting your material " into the mix