Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Happy Birthday Stephen Hawking

On this date in 1942, cosmologist Stephen Hawking was born in Oxford, England, "300 years after the death of Galileo," as he once noted. He attended Oxford, studying physics, then earned his Ph.D. in cosmology at Cambridge. By his 21st birthday he had been diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Lou Gehrig's disease).

Despite his disability, which confined him to a wheelchair and forced him to rely on mechanized speech, Hawking became a research fellow, worked at the Institute of Astronomy, and in 1973 joined the Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics at Cambridge.

Hawking is celebrated for his work on unifying General Relativity with Quantum Theory. His popular science books include A Brief History of Time, Black Holes and Baby Universes and Other Essays and The Universe in a Nutshell. Although some rationalists have been disappointed in his tendency to use the term "god" too loosely as a metaphor, Hawking made it clear he did not believe in a personal god.

In an interview with Diane Sawyer on ABC News (June 7, 2010), Hawking said, "There is a fundamental difference between religion, which is based on authority, [and] science, which is based on observation and reason. Science will win because it works."

In his follow-up book The Grand Design (2010), Hawking and co-author Caltech physicist Leonard Mlodinow wrote that “God” is not necessary: "Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist. It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going.”

In an interview with the Spanish newspaper El Mundo (Nov. 6, 2015), Hawking was more forthright about declaring his atheism: "Before we understand science, it is natural to believe that God created the universe. But now science offers a more convincing explanation. What I meant by 'we would know the mind of God' is, we would know everything that God would know, if there were a God, which there isn't. I'm an atheist (Soy ateo)."

In his last book, Brief Answers to the Big Questions, published posthumously in 2018, Hawking wrote, "There is no God. No one directs the universe." Included in his parting advice: “Remember to look up at the stars and not down at your feet. Try to make sense of what you see and wonder about what makes the universe exist. Be curious. And however difficult life may seem, there is always something you can do and succeed at.”

Hawking met Jane Wilde in 1962, the year before his motor neuron diagnosis. They married in 1965 and had three children: Robert (1967), Lucy (1969) and Timothy (1979). His poor health and her strong Christian beliefs led to their divorce in 1995, after which he soon married Elaine Mason, one of his nurses.

After their divorce in 2006, Hawking resumed closer relationships with Jane and his children. Her book Travelling to Infinity: My Life with Stephen was published in 2007 and was made into a film, "The Theory of Everything," in 2014.

Hawking died at his home in Cambridge at age 76 on March 14, 2018. His ashes were interred in Westminster Abbey's nave between the graves of Sir Isaac Newton and Charles Darwin.

NASA public domain photo

“All that my work has shown is that you don't have to say that the way the universe began was the personal whim of God.”

—Hawking, "Black Holes and Baby Universes and Other Essays" (1993)

© Freedom From Religion Foundation. All rights reserved.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Mathers · 61-69
Hawking should have stuck to science and not his total misunderstanding of faith. See Prof John Lennox on ‘God and Stephen Hawking’. Incidentally it was not her ‘strong Christian beliefs’ that led to the breakdown of the marriage but Gawking’s relationship to one of his nurses who he married then subsequently divorced.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@Mathers So, your contention is that he wasn't a perfect human being, so therefore he should be ignored. Interesting.
Mathers · 61-69
Is that what I said? You are a champion of putting words in peoples mouths they didn’t say! What I did say was that he should’ve stuck to science and even some of his science is pretty far fetched in the opinion of certain other scientists. The problem is with SH and people like him is that they try and make science into a God and of course science is just exploring the world God has made. As Kepler said, ‘Thinking God’s thoughts after him’ @LordShadowfire
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@Mathers
You are a champion of putting words in peoples mouths they didn’t say!
Said the pot to the kettle.
...even some of his science is pretty far fetched in the opinion of certain other scientists.
Name one.
The problem is with SH and people like him is that they try and make science into a God...
He said, proving he doesn't understand the scientific method in the slightest.
As Kepler said, ‘Thinking God’s thoughts after him’
Mathers · 61-69
John Lennox for one. There are certainly those who think that Hawkings Multiverse is complete fantasy. It is of course theology rather than science in an attempt to dispense with a creator.
Your problem is that you obviously don’t understand science and you are blinded by celebrity and your own prejudices @LordShadowfire
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@Mathers
John Lennox
And he is...?
It (multiverse theory) is of course theology rather than science in an attempt to dispense with a creator.
And what's your degree in?
Your problem is that you obviously don’t understand science and you are blinded by celebrity and your own prejudices
He said to the mirror.
Mathers · 61-69
One of my degrees is in physics. Yours? @LordShadowfire
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@Mathers Yet you deny physics in your eagerness to embrace a creator who breaks more laws of physics than multiverse theory, which is actually plausible.
Mathers · 61-69
I don’t deny physics at all. But if you knew any physics at all you would know that the multiverse is metaphysics. When we are dealing with the creator we are dealing with someone who is above the laws of science which govern the universe he has made. God is not man and he is not governed by those laws.

Has that ever occurred to you? God is not made in man’s image@LordShadowfire
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@Mathers
I don’t deny physics at all.
Then please explain why God is the special exception to your claim that everything that exists needs a creator.
When we are dealing with the creator we are dealing with someone who is above the laws of science which govern the universe he has made.
Forgetting for a moment that you can't even prove he made anything, why?
God is not made in man’s image
Oh, he absolutely is. Read the bible. It's all about a being who is so insecure in his own power that he demands absolute submission from a race of creatures he created in the first place, in an ultimate show of divine narcissism.
Mathers · 61-69
‘He is before all things and in Him and by Him all things exist’ - by definition the eternal Creator does not need creating else he is not God.
I can’t prove it to you as you have your eyes shut.

Your statement shows you have no concept of the love of God and the fact that the only way we reflect his image is to love him back. Else we become self-narcissists @LordShadowfire
This comment is hidden. Show Comment