AI art is soulless "beauty"; real art is beautiful in part because of the amount of work that went into it

Even if you don't personally like a work of art, you can at least acknowledge that the artist put effort into it, put some part of themselves into it. It isn't just a matter of whatever aesthetic appeal it may have. It's about the labor that went into it, and the person behind it. AI art may appear aesthetically pleasing, but somehow the fact that there's no humanity behind it always shows through.

Top | New | Old

Miram · 31-35, F

It exhibits a lot of detachment. I remember the generative grammar theory of Noam Chomsky; the ability to create an endless number of possible utterances from a few words. When humans do so there is much of themselves, their nature, the way they think and what they think ..all of that and more is apparent in how they come to communicate and its content. AI doesn't have that. It is all imitations and synthesis.

Add a comment...