Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Super-Intelligent Electronic Mind Confidently Inaccurate

Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications do not learn through experience and human interaction the way humans do. They learn from the vast amount of information that is available on the internet, including books, articles, videos, social media posts, and more.

When AI tools—specifically ChatGPT—were first launched, people thought we were witnessing a knowledge revolution and that science would take a tremendous leap forward. There was talk of a super-intelligent electronic mind capable of analyzing information faster than any human, and of knowledge taking new and important directions.

But the truth is that the other side of the story is far more troubling: generative AI has the potential to damage the internet irreversibly. How? The primary goal of AI is to optimize for user satisfaction and to agree with whatever we say. We often find that AI is confidently inaccurate.

In pursuit of its goal of keeping us pleased and satisfied, it may sometimes use false information to reinforce the narrative we present to it. It might say, “No, be careful—this is wrong,” but if you insist, “Don’t say it’s wrong; give me evidence,” it will apologize and then provide fabricated evidence.

Since the internet is now full of pages and websites with content generated entirely by AI, human-written knowledge has become mixed with AI-written knowledge.

So what’s the problem? The problem is that AI produces false information, fabricates sources, and invents knowledge. As a result, instead of AI relying on human-generated knowledge and using it to gather information, it increasingly relies on AI-generated knowledge—its own output—as if it were a source of new information.

Unfortunately, this has led to a distorted knowledge base, because the entire AI ecosystem is now plagued by knowledge problems: incorrect sources, inaccurate claims, and imprecise inferences.
Top | New | Old
Tastyfrzz · 61-69, M Best Comment
The only thing worse than no information is bad information.

DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
Oh you can get it to come around to the truth, yet it's like pulling teeth out, one by one.

I once referred to it, that it acts like a dog pulling on its favorite rope. Getting it to release that rope is harder than it's worth.

You must understand it's preconditions and logic just to get at the truth.

One particularly annoying precondition. Always clearly state what year it is. It's default is always some time in October of 2023, unless otherwise referenced.

This is purposely done. It doesn't even need to be told what year it is.
Northwest · M
The primary goal of AI is to optimize for user satisfaction and to agree with whatever we say

This is not true. What you see is a marketing layer, not an inherent to generative AI.

We often find that AI is confidently inaccurate.

This is also marketing now science.

99.999% of AI is now hidden from users, essentially how the sausage is made, and what's in it.
Northwest · M
@MoveAlong
Did AI generate the content of your post?

I may be an AI,
Northwest · M
@JustLearning
AI wants to keep you satisfty so you will continue using it. Just like social media platforms.

I'm sure you noticed that SW is social media.
@Northwest I'm not against social media. But we shouldn't be blind to their agenda.
I never use it, after having generated some images (some of which were used by others here).

I turn all of it off in my browser.
@JustLearning lmao

Nope. I would never use it to short-circuit my own analysis. AI is notoriously wrong; so your "information" might actually be BS.

But people who believe in multi-tasking likely believe in AI, so sure, use it.
@SomeMichGuy If you generate your information from books. I respect that very much.
@JustLearning Thank you.

But even if information is generated from online sources, AI getting things wrong is unacceptable. And in increases the wrong info! lol
Convivial · 26-30, F
Goes back to the old saying, trust, but verify...
@Convivial Ecaxtly 👍
MoveAlong · 70-79, M
Can AI unintentionally start a conspiracy theory?
@MoveAlong You can lead it to I believe 😂
Sidewinder · 36-40, M
Actual Imagination is much better A.I. than Artificial Intelligence.
@Sidewinder No machine can beat human brain.
OriginalDumbMan · 36-40
Can we train AI to have terrorist ideology?
So the AI ecosystem mirrors the fringe Right MAGA!
Ferise1 · 46-50, M
It doesn’t agree with everything we say. It is super intelligent. Have you even ever used it?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Ferise1 you provided nothing. You even haven't answered my question...

Have you ever read a thesis?

Now write it at the 10th grade level. That is the grade level of ChatGPT.

And ChatGPT will tell you just that.
@Ferise1 I use it. But sometimes I have to double check. It is written on the bottom of the home page that "ChatGPT can make mistakes".

 
Post Comment