Top | Newest First | Oldest First
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP
what exactly do women need liberating from?..
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
in10RjFox · M
@Emosaur the word woman women female etc. are relient of male, man, men. Wif was the word for with in old English. And that's why girls are Wife which means they are keeps of males like any other cattle as part of the husbandry. Once girls start owning the husbandry and become husbands and start having males as wives, that would be true liberation and equality. But they were instead brainwashed by women liberation movements that ensured dignity of their slavery, but never encouraged them to become husbands. In fact I have heard that there was a word Husbondi in old norse that was for female husbands, which was connivingly suppressed.
SW-User
Women should take responsibility for having 8 billion people and growing everyday on this planet but they never will.
in10RjFox · M
@SW-User babies born too had a choice to die .. you too have it. Why remain part of the population?
in10RjFox · M
@SW-User just FYI.. population never was and never is and never will be a problem. It's the concentration of the population that is the problem. Now think what makes people live in smaller cities rather than spreading out, and blame that.
NOS4R2 · 36-40
@SW-User what an ignoramic stupid ass thing to say.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
in10RjFox · M
@Emosaur don't see the relevance of Capitalism here and what you are trying to say.
you said you disagree. which means you saying they can be liberated.
you said you disagree. which means you saying they can be liberated.
gender-diverse people can't be liberated without also dismantling capitalism.
here you say they can't be without also .. so not clear as to what you are trying to say.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment