Proof for atheists

Proof for atheists

Scientists have to accept the existence of the unimaginable nature from the practical example of the unimaginable limits of this infinite universe. Scientists may reject miracles but they cannot reject the unimaginable limits of space. One instance of the existence of an unimaginable entity is sufficient to prove the existence of unimaginable God. Miracles act as supporting evidence of the same concept.

Miracles are very widely distributed in the world to give proof for the existence of God to every human being, which is the basic requirement. If you pray sincerely in a temple or even in an open place, generally God gives you His answer through a miracle. Many have witnessed this in their lives. Sometimes due to the inevitable fruits of your past deeds, God keeps silent for sometime in spite of your prayers and that time is used for your transformation. Hence, scientists call this as probability or coincidence of events . Hence, God demonstrates specific miracles through His human form, to meet this twisted interpretation of scientists or atheists. Even devotees and demons do specific miracles.
God has given a wide coverage for spreading miracles since it involves the very basic issue of His existence.

Top | New | Old

BlueSkyKing · M

“When anyone tells me that he saw a dead man restored to life, I immediately consider with myself whether it be more probable that this person should either deceive or be deceived or that the fact which he relates should really have happened. I weigh the one miracle against the other and according to the superiority which I discover, I pronounce my decision. Always I reject the greater miracle. If the falsehood of his testimony would be more miraculous than the event which he relates, then and not till then, can he pretend to command my belief or opinion.”
― David Hume

robertsnj · 56-60, M

You are Hindu Swami? there is between 1-.25 % percent of the population of India depending on the source are atheists. India is by far has the most Hindu's in the world. If you are trying to stop Indians from being atheists in India--congrats your team succeed.

If you living outside of India the majority religion is probably Christianity or maybe Islam. Trying to convert them to Hinduism may be an easier goal. They (we) won't ask for evidence every time you post on here or anywhere.

On a sidenote this opening post is so rambling and devoid of a point. I have no idea what you are rambling about at all.

If you were not aware Christianity blatantly plagiarized much of your religion. From the virgin birth, to the 12 disciples to the trinity to the resurrection--they took it from your much older religion and put into theirs. Pointing that out to Christians may be an easy entry point to flipping some of them.

In that idea flipping other believers who are not Hindi may be much easier than looking for evidence that thousands, tens-of-thousands believers have failed to produce before you.

SW-User

There really is a total contradiction between your words speaking of the unknowability of the Ultimate, and then your precise declaration of exactly how He deals with us.

I would get yourself sorted out before flooding SW with what are only opinions of your own.

dattaswami · 51-55, M

@SW-User The actual reason is that the intelligence of the devotee can imagine anything, which has the spatial dimensions (length, breadth and height). Anything, which does not have the spatial dimensions, becomes logically unimaginable. You can test this point by closing your eyes and constantly try to imagine anything, which is not having spatial dimensions. Even the minutest particle that you can imagine must have some least measurable or atleast spatial dimensions, which can be calculated atleast by calculations if not by instruments. Therefore, the problem to understand the God lies with the devotee and not with God. You have to keep God beyond the space because God is the generating cause of the space.

You cannot find pot in the lump of mud before the generation of the pot. If you say that the pot exists already in the mud, you cannot say that the pot is generated after the preparation of the pot since the pot already exists in the mud. Therefore, the effect should not be in the cause before its generation. Hence, the space should not exist in God before its generation. It means the original God before the generation of space does not have the characteristics of space, which are the spatial dimensions. This logic inevitably keeps God beyond space and hence, unimaginable.

Bumbles · 51-55, M

Is there an actual argument here? I will say that your understanding of the methodology of science is absolute zero.

bijouxbroussard · F

Wrong group…

View 12 more replies »

ElRengo · 70-79, M

@DeWayfarer
That´s certainly good.
Even so I´ve seen some people "of the kind" vanishing from time to time and coming back.
Perhaps we should´t put too much hopes on what is far from being an individual behaviour but a social / cultural one.

BTW he also initiated at least some posts in the Evolution forum.

DeWayfarer · 61-69, M

@ElRengo We'll see. Yet given his predisposition for some science as small as it is I suspect he might follow through. Might seem illogical. Yet psychology is a soft science that I'm a tiny bit familiar with.

ElRengo · 70-79, M

@DeWayfarer
Congratulations about your familiarity with psychology.
I find it of high value though I have no academic formation on it.

I don´t see at all illogical your prediction.
I agree with it even if probably from another (perhaps converging) approach.

DocSavage · M

So, where and what exactly are you calling proof ?

DocSavage · M

Bollocks !

SW-User

@DocSavage Could you try to be a bit more explicit?

😀

Add a comment...